155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7466283)
21. Audiological implications of earplugs used for the prevention of aural exostoses.
Srinivasan J; Reddy VM; Flanagan PM
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Mar; 269(3):787-90. PubMed ID: 21822855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A trail of individual education for hearing protection with an instrument that measures the noise attenuation effect of wearing earplugs.
Tsukada T; Sakakibara H
Ind Health; 2008 Aug; 46(4):393-6. PubMed ID: 18716388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An evaluation of the effectiveness of three hearing protection devices at an industrial facility with a TWA of 107 dB.
Royster LH; Royster JD; Cecich TF
J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Aug; 76(2):485-97. PubMed ID: 6480999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessment of personal hearing protection in practice.
Smoorenburg GF; Mimpen TM
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 16():13-22. PubMed ID: 6962507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. A study of the real-world noise attenuation of the current hearing protection devices in typical workplaces using Field Microphone in Real Ear method.
Aliabadi M; Biabani A; Golmohammadi R; Farhadian M
Work; 2018; 60(2):271-279. PubMed ID: 29865097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Attenuation efficiency of hearing protectors for workers exposed to noise].
Murakami M; Hirota Y; Ohwada H; Kanemitsu K
Sangyo Igaku; 1984 Mar; 26(2):178-9. PubMed ID: 6503014
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Predictive factors of occupational noise-induced hearing loss in Spanish workers: A prospective study.
Pelegrin AC; Canuet L; Rodríguez ÁA; Morales MP
Noise Health; 2015; 17(78):343-9. PubMed ID: 26356377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Models for studying the progression of hearing loss caused by noise.
Ivarsson A; Bennrup S; Toremalm NG
Scand Audiol; 1992; 21(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 1641576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of the hearing threshold measured by manual pure-tone and by self-recording (Békésy) audiometry.
Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Ivarsson A; Nilsson P
Audiology; 1979; 18(5):414-29. PubMed ID: 496724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Consistency of attenuation across multiple fittings of custom and non-custom earplugs.
Tufts JB; Jahn KN; Byram JP
Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Jun; 57(5):571-80. PubMed ID: 23267007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Noise attenuation of hearing protectors against heavy weapon noise.
Pääkkönen R; Lehtomäki K; Savolainen S; Myllyniemi J; Hämäläinen E
Mil Med; 2000 Sep; 165(9):678-82. PubMed ID: 11011540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An acoustic head simulator for hearing protector evaluation. II: Measurements in steady-state and impulse noise environments.
Giguère C; Kunov H
J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Mar; 85(3):1197-205. PubMed ID: 2708666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Training in using earplugs or using earplugs with a higher than necessary noise reduction rating? A randomized clinical trial.
Salmani Nodoushan M; Mehrparvar AH; Torab Jahromi M; Safaei S; Mollasadeghi A
Int J Occup Environ Med; 2014 Oct; 5(4):187-93. PubMed ID: 25270008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [The role of information and training for workers on the correct use of earplugs in assessing real noise attenuation with E-A-RfitTM system].
Cassano F; Aloise I; Labianca G; Gaccione V; Mazzotta C; Cardascia F; Garavaglia M; Germano C; Dentamaro A; Di Lorenzo L
Med Lav; 2015 Jul; 106(4):284-93. PubMed ID: 26154471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effectiveness of foam earplug hearing protection for artillerymen firing L118/119 105 mm howitzers.
Carter NL
Mil Med; 1989 Sep; 154(9):473-6. PubMed ID: 2507968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A controlled investigation of in-field attenuation performance of selected insert, earmuff, and canal cap hearing protectors.
Park MY; Casali JG
Hum Factors; 1991 Dec; 33(6):693-714. PubMed ID: 1800294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Group mean hearing threshold changes in a noise-exposed industrial population using personal hearing protectors.
Savell JF; Toothman EH
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Jan; 48(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3565259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Systematic Evaluation of the Relationship between Physical and Psychoacoustical Measurements of Hearing Protectors' Attenuation.
Nélisse H; Le Cocq C; Boutin J; Laville F; Voix J
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(12):829-44. PubMed ID: 26023884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
