These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7468604)

  • 1. Does the Hyde Amendment violate religious freedom? Harris v. McRae and the First Amendment.
    Gold JA
    Am J Law Med; 1980; 6(3):361-72. PubMed ID: 7468604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Supreme Court and abortion: 2. Sidestepping social realities.
    Mechanic D
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Dec; 10(6):17-9. PubMed ID: 7007284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Constitutional law--United States Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment...--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
    Barnett BA
    Temple Law Q; 1981; 54(1):109-44. PubMed ID: 11655628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recent developments in the health care area.
    Harper TD; Berg RN
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1980 Sep; 69(9):785-7. PubMed ID: 7191438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Euthanasia and the Supreme Court's competing conceptions of religious liberty.
    Stacy T
    Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(1):55-78. PubMed ID: 8077103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Constitutional law--health law--constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment--medically necessary abortions need not be funded by the state or federal government under Medicaid--Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 (1980).
    Brath MS
    Whittier Law Rev; 1981; 3(3):381-408. PubMed ID: 11655629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Religious hiring exemption upheld: anatomy of a Supreme Court ruling.
    Chopko ME
    Health Prog; 1988; 69(6):40-4, 47. PubMed ID: 10288412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abortion debate continues: a look at laws, regulations, restrictions and funding.
    Smith JA
    Calif Nurse; 1980 Jun; 76(1):8. PubMed ID: 6991059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. First amendment -- California Supreme Court holds that free exercise of religion does not give fertility doctors right to deny treatment to lesbians. -- North Coast Women's Care Medical Group, Inc. v. San Diego County Superior Court, 189 P.3d 959 (Cal. 2008).
    Harv Law Rev; 2008 Dec; 122(2):787-94. PubMed ID: 19130682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law.
    Denniston L
    Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Harris v. McRae: the Hyde Amendment stands while rights of poor women fall.
    Sewell CC; Wetterer MA
    KY Law J; 1980-1981; 69(2):359-91. PubMed ID: 11655486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trouble in Vineville: church property and the civil courts.
    Cribari SJ
    Health Prog; 1985; 66(6):55-9, 70. PubMed ID: 10274185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Crisis of conscience: reconciling religious health care providers' beliefs and patients' rights.
    White KA
    Stanford Law Rev; 1999 Jul; 51(6):1703-49. PubMed ID: 10558539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Hyde Amendment and the future.
    Rosoff JI
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1980; 12(4):172. PubMed ID: 7002585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anti-abortion movement.
    Wilson K
    Plan Parent Rev; 1985; 5(2):4-6. PubMed ID: 12340405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Hyde Amendment: an infringement upon the free exercise clause?
    Biskin JC
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1981; 33(4):1054-75. PubMed ID: 11655472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Supreme Court upholds Hyde Amendment.
    Helms J
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1980 Jul; 126(3):S9136-42. PubMed ID: 11664146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Substantive due process after Gonzales v. Carhart.
    Calabresi SG
    Mich Law Rev; 2008 Jun; 106(8):1517-42. PubMed ID: 18595213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Internet free speech wins court test.
    James JS
    AIDS Treat News; 1996 Jun; (no 249):4. PubMed ID: 11363597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.