These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7469198)
1. Automated chromosome analysis using the Magiscan Image Analyser. Graham J; Taylor CJ Anal Quant Cytol; 1980 Dec; 2(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 7469198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Experience with the Athena semi-automated karyotyping system. Mayall BH; Tucker JD; Christensen ML; van Vliet LJ; Young IT Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 2307063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the selection of systems for automated cytogenetic analysis. Lundsteen C; Martin AO Am J Med Genet; 1989 Jan; 32(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 2650549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automatic classification of chromosomes as part of a routine system for clinical analysis. Lundsteen C; Gerdes T; Maahr J Cytometry; 1986 Jan; 7(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 3948602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic chromosome analysis. II. Karyotyping of banded human chromosomes using band transition sequences. Lundsteen C; Gerdes T; Granum E; Philip J; Philip K Clin Genet; 1981 Jan; 19(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 7460378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Machine based chromosomes investigations with the Quantimet 720 (author's transl)]. Malkusch W Microsc Acta Suppl; 1977; (1):95-103. PubMed ID: 392260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of image manipulation on automated karyotyping. Stanley RJ; Caldwell CW; Keller J; Gader P Biomed Sci Instrum; 1997; 33():305-10. PubMed ID: 9731376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated chromosome classification limitations due to image processing. Stanley R; Keller J; Gader P; Caldwell CW Biomed Sci Instrum; 1995; 31():183-8. PubMed ID: 7654959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Data-driven homologue matching for chromosome identification. Stanley RJ; Keller JM; Gader P; Caldwell CW IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Jun; 17(3):451-62. PubMed ID: 9735908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Athena semi-automated karyotyping system. van Vliet LJ; Young IT; Mayall BH Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 2307062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of the MAGISCAN image analyser in automated uterine cancer cytology. Pycock D; Taylor CJ Anal Quant Cytol; 1980 Sep; 2(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 7425440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Homologue matching using the Choquet integral. Stanley RJ; Keller J; Gader P; Caldwell CW Biomed Sci Instrum; 1997; 34():315-20. PubMed ID: 9603059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [A new system of chromosome analysis by image treatment: the chromoscan]. Malet P; Geneix A; Bonton P; Catinot P; Perissel B C R Seances Soc Biol Fil; 1987; 181(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 2957039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A rule-based computer scheme for centromere identification and polarity assignment of metaphase chromosomes. Wang X; Zheng B; Li S; Mulvihill JJ; Liu H Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Jan; 89(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 18082909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Recent developments of instrument assisted chromosome analysis with Quantimet 720 (author's transl)]. Malkusch W Microsc Acta Suppl; 1979; (3):221-8. PubMed ID: 396456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Chromosome analysis using image processing. Recent aspects and perspectives]. Malet P; Geneix A; Bonton P; Grouche L; Perissel B Ann Genet; 1989; 32(3):164-8. PubMed ID: 2683979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]