These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7469597)

  • 1. [Design and evaluation of a duplication of the cardiac for the evaluation of valvular prostheses].
    Peón J; Valenzuela F; Cabrera J; Carrillo G; Aguirre A; Kabela E
    Arch Inst Cardiol Mex; 1980; 50(5):535-43. PubMed ID: 7469597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Dynamic and cinematic evaluation of the function of bioprosthesis in the aortic position: tester of cardiac valves].
    Bustamante J; Santamaría J; Infante O; Flores P; Juárez A
    Arch Inst Cardiol Mex; 1996; 66(3):229-43. PubMed ID: 8967818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hydrodynamic comparison of biological prostheses during progressive valve calcification in a simulated exercise situation. An in vitro study.
    Bakhtiary F; Dzemali O; Steinseiffer U; Schmitz C; Glasmacher B; Moritz A; Kleine P
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(5):960-3. PubMed ID: 18774723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A novel pulse duplicator system: evaluation of different valve prostheses.
    Haaf P; Steiner M; Attmann T; Pfister G; Cremer J; Lutter G
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Feb; 57(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 19169990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.
    Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available bileaflet mechanical valves.
    Bottio T; Caprili L; Casarotto D; Gerosa G
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2004 Sep; 128(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 15354108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Bio-artificial organs: cardiac applications].
    Flameng W
    Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2004; 66(4):246-52. PubMed ID: 15553097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Harvested porcine mitral xenograft fixation: impact on fluid dynamic performance.
    Jensen MO; Lemmon JD; Gessaghi VC; Conrad CP; Levine RA; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan; 10(1):111-24. PubMed ID: 11206757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic impact stress analysis of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve.
    Yuan Q; Xu L; Ngoi BK; Yeo TJ; Hwang NH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Jan; 12(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 12578344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In-vitro testing of three totally supra-annular bileaflet mechanical valves: hydrodynamics in the Sheffield pulse duplicator.
    Bottio T; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Gerosa G
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Mar; 17(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 18512495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of cardiac valves in artificial heart performance.
    Olsen DB; Fukumasu H; Nakagaki M; Nielsen SD; Kessler TR; Lawson JL; Kolff J
    Med Instrum; 1979; 13(4):218-22. PubMed ID: 381858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Macroscopic aspects of cloth-covered Starr-Edwards prostheses at reoperation: what the precursory valve teaches us.
    Tsukamoto S; Shiono M; Orime Y; Hata H; Yagi S; Okumura H; Inoue T; Kimura S; Sezai A; Sezai Y
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):556-60. PubMed ID: 9793856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Causes and formation of cavitation in mechanical heart valves.
    Graf T; Reul H; Detlefs C; Wilmes R; Rau G
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Apr; 3 Suppl 1():S49-64. PubMed ID: 8061870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sound spectral analysis of prosthetic valvular clicks for diagnosis of thrombosed Björk-Shiley tilting standard disc valve prostheses.
    Sato N; Miura M; Itoh T; Ohmi M; Haneda K; Mohri H; Nitta S; Tanaka M
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb; 105(2):313-20. PubMed ID: 8429660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of prosthetic valve hydrodynamic function: objective testing using statistical multilevel modeling.
    Bernacca GM; McColl JH; Wheatley DJ
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):467-77. PubMed ID: 15222295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of left ventricular dP/dt on the in vitro dynamics of the Björk-Shiley Convexo-Concave mitral valve.
    Rau G; Reul H; Eichler M; Schreck S; Wieting DW
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1995 Jul; 4 Suppl 1():S17-20. PubMed ID: 8581205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Results with mechanical cardiac valvular prostheses.
    Akins CW
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1995 Dec; 60(6):1836-44. PubMed ID: 8787503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of various mechanical heart values in the mitral and aortic positions.
    Iwahashi K; Ota T; Okada M; Tsukube T; Matsuda H
    Kobe J Med Sci; 1993 Jun; 39(3):81-93. PubMed ID: 8255076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemodynamics of high-performance bileaflet valves: comparison to simulated clinical Doppler measurements.
    Dohmen G; Schmitz C; Schmitz-Rode T; Steinseifer U; Autschbach R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jul; 15(4):549-56. PubMed ID: 16901053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New insights in minimally invasive valve replacement: description of a cooperative approach for the off-pump replacement of mitral valves.
    Boudjemline Y; Pineau E; Borenstein N; Behr L; Bonhoeffer P
    Eur Heart J; 2005 Oct; 26(19):2013-7. PubMed ID: 15872031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.