BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7470410)

  • 1. Epidemiological evidence for two components of cervical cancer.
    Hakama M; Penttinen J
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1981 Mar; 88(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 7470410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mass screening programmes and trends in cervical cancer in Finland and the Netherlands.
    van der Aa MA; Pukkala E; Coebergh JW; Anttila A; Siesling S
    Int J Cancer; 2008 Apr; 122(8):1854-8. PubMed ID: 18067129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of population screening for carcinoma of the uterine cervix in Finland.
    Hakama M
    Maturitas; 1985 May; 7(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 4021826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experience of a continuing mass screening programme. Screening and re-screening for cervical carcinoma in Turku.
    Grönroos M; Tyrkkö J; Järvi O; Rauramo L
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1974; 63(6):470-8. PubMed ID: 4441027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of a mass screening program on the risk of cervical cancer.
    Hakama M; Räsänen-Virtanen U
    Am J Epidemiol; 1976 May; 103(5):512-7. PubMed ID: 1274953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mass screenings for cervical cancer in Finland 1963-71. Organization, extent, and epidemiological implications.
    Hakama M; Joutsenlahti U; Virtanen A; Räsänen-Virtanen U
    Ann Clin Res; 1975 Apr; 7(2):101-11. PubMed ID: 1181974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of organised screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Finland, 1963-1995: recent increase in cervical cancer incidence.
    Anttila A; Pukkala E; Söderman B; Kallio M; Nieminen P; Hakama M
    Int J Cancer; 1999 Sep; 83(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 10449609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mass screening for cervical carcinoma in Finland. Organization and effect on morbidity and mortality.
    Timonen S; Nieminen U; Kauraniemi T
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1974; 63(2):104-12. PubMed ID: 4853102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age-related incidence of cervical cancer supports two aetiological components: a population-based register study.
    Seppä K; Pitkäniemi J; Malila N; Hakama M
    BJOG; 2016 Apr; 123(5):772-8. PubMed ID: 26599730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Mass screening for cervical cancer in a high risk group].
    Hakama M; Räsänen-Virtanen U
    Duodecim; 1975; 91(9):579-85. PubMed ID: 1175484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mass population screening for cervical cancer in Miyagi Prefecture.
    Yajima A; Higashiiwai H; Sato A; Watanabe M; Hoshi K; Mori T; Yonemoto Y; Suzuki M; Noda K
    Gynecol Oncol; 1979 Oct; 8(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 499921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abnormal cervical smears: are we in for an epidemic?
    Wolfendale MR; King S; Usherwood MM
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 Aug; 287(6391):526-8. PubMed ID: 6411205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Forty years of repeated screening: the significance of carcinoma in situ.
    Morrison BJ; Coldman AJ; Boyes DA; Anderson GH
    Br J Cancer; 1996 Sep; 74(5):814-9. PubMed ID: 8795587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mass screening in Sweden for cancer of the uterine cervix: effect on incidence and mortality. An overview.
    Kjellgren O
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1986; 22(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 3770533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk of cervical cancer after a negative Pap smear.
    Viikki M; Pukkala E; Hakama M
    J Med Screen; 1999; 6(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 10444730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical cancer incidence and mortality trends in Finland and Estonia: a screened vs. an unscreened population.
    Aareleid T; Pukkala E; Thomson H; Hakama M
    Eur J Cancer; 1993; 29A(5):745-9. PubMed ID: 8471334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Duration of preclinical cervical cancer and reduction in incidence of invasive cancer following negative pap smears.
    van Oortmarssen GJ; Habbema JD
    Int J Epidemiol; 1995 Apr; 24(2):300-7. PubMed ID: 7635589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trends in cervical cancer and carcinoma in situ in Great Britain.
    Cook GA; Draper GJ
    Br J Cancer; 1984 Sep; 50(3):367-75. PubMed ID: 6466546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [In situ and invasive cervical cancer epidemiology in the province of Girona, Spain 1990-2004: incidence, mortality, survival and screening history].
    Castro Marqueta P; Moreno-Crespi J; Buxó-Pujolràs M; Cervantes-Amat M; Pérez-Gómez B; Marcos-Gragera R
    Med Clin (Barc); 2011 Feb; 136(5):192-8. PubMed ID: 21051058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Arkansas cervical cancer program.
    Steinkamp RC; Roman-Lopez J; Kenney JA; Hairston MG; Hylton S; Hammett WN; Marsh S; Becton P; Collier S
    J Ark Med Soc; 1980 Jan; 76(1):312-22. PubMed ID: 6444400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.