These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7472130)

  • 1. Adaptive programs for analysis of the visual field by automatic perimetry--basic problems and solutions. Efforts oriented towards the realisation of the generalised spatially adaptive Octopus program SAPRO.
    Haeberlin H; Fankhauser F
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1980 Dec; 50(1):123-41. PubMed ID: 7472130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advantages and limitations of the spatially adaptive program SAPRO in clinical perimetry.
    Fankhauser F; Funkhouser A; Kwasniewska S
    Int Ophthalmol; 1986 May; 9(2-3):179-89. PubMed ID: 3755124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Octopus programs SAPRO and F. Two new principles for the analysis of the visual field.
    Fankhauser F; Häberlin H; Jenni A
    Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol; 1981; 216(2):155-65. PubMed ID: 6910354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Friedmann visual field analyser tested on neuro-ophthalmological cases.
    Bynke H; Nordenfelt L
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1974; 52(6):861-71. PubMed ID: 4480333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pupil motor perimetry.
    Bresky RH; Charles S
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1969 Jul; 68(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 5793653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening for visual field abnormalities with automated perimetry.
    Keltner JL; Johnson CA
    Surv Ophthalmol; 1983; 28(3):175-83. PubMed ID: 6422573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A feasible development of computerized perimetry.
    Krakau CE
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1981 Aug; 59(4):485-94. PubMed ID: 7315206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computer-generated display for three-dimensional static perimetry.
    Hart WM; Hartz RK
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1982 Feb; 100(2):312-8. PubMed ID: 7065952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic (Octopus) and manual (Goldmann) perimetry in glaucoma.
    Schmied U
    Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol; 1980; 213(4):239-44. PubMed ID: 6906155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Peritest automatic perimeter in screening for glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Douglas GR
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1983 Dec; 18(7):318-20. PubMed ID: 6671150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An algorithm for visual fields.
    Trobe JD; Acosta PC
    Surv Ophthalmol; 1980; 24(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 7414506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the applications of the spatially adaptive program (SAPRO) in clinical perimetry: Part I.
    Fankhauser F; Funkhouser A; Kwasniewska S
    Ophthalmic Surg; 1986 Jun; 17(6):338-42 contd. PubMed ID: 3755519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Volume perimetry: measurement in depth of visual field loss.
    Satgunam P; Apfelbaum HL; Peli E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Sep; 89(9):E1265-75. PubMed ID: 22922780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Computer perimetry of glaucomatous visual field defects at different stimulus sizes (author's transl)].
    Gramer E; Kontić D; Krieglstein GK
    Ophthalmologica; 1981; 183(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 7312301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The automatic perimeter octopus in clinic and research. Possibilities for using the new Octopus programs: F-series, SARGON, DELTA and SAPRO].
    Fankhauser F
    Buch Augenarzt; 1982; 90():1-12. PubMed ID: 7093771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A clinical comparison of the Friedmann visual field analyser and tangent screen perimetry.
    Gutteridge IF
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1982 Feb; 59(2):184-94. PubMed ID: 7065111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of kinetic programs in various automated perimeters.
    Hashimoto S; Matsumoto C; Eura M; Okuyama S; Shimomura Y
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jul; 61(4):299-306. PubMed ID: 28444485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of Test Strategy on Octopus Perimeter Cluster Mean Defect Values: Adaptive Bracketing Normal Strategy Versus Tendency-oriented Perimetry.
    Holló G
    J Glaucoma; 2016 Oct; 25(10):830-834. PubMed ID: 27300642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Programmed visual field testing.
    Anderson DR
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1982; 80():326-48. PubMed ID: 7182966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual field screening with a laptop computer system.
    Bruun-Jensen J
    Optometry; 2011 Sep; 82(9):519-27. PubMed ID: 21871394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.