90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7472747)
1. Three-dimensional geometric and structural symmetry of the turkey ulna.
Adams DJ; Pedersen DR; Brand RA; Rubin CT; Brown TD
J Orthop Res; 1995 Sep; 13(5):690-9. PubMed ID: 7472747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ontogenetic and regional morphologic variations in the turkey ulna diaphysis: implications for functional adaptation of cortical bone.
Skedros JG; Hunt KJ; Hughes PE; Winet H
Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol; 2003 Jul; 273(1):609-29. PubMed ID: 12808646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiscale computational and experimental approaches to elucidate bone and ligament mechanobiology using the ulna-radius-interosseous membrane construct as a model system.
Knothe Tate ML; Tami AE; Netrebko P; Milz S; Docheva D
Technol Health Care; 2012; 20(5):363-78. PubMed ID: 23079942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental and finite element analysis of the rat ulnar loading model-correlations between strain and bone formation following fatigue loading.
Kotha SP; Hsieh YF; Strigel RM; Müller R; Silva MJ
J Biomech; 2004 Apr; 37(4):541-8. PubMed ID: 14996566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Carpal bone anatomy measured by computer analysis of three-dimensional reconstructions of computed tomography images.
Patterson RM; Elder KW; Viegas SF; Buford WL
J Hand Surg Am; 1995 Nov; 20(6):923-9. PubMed ID: 8583063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correction of photon attenuation and collimator response for a body-contouring SPECT/CT imaging system.
Seo Y; Wong KH; Sun M; Franc BL; Hawkins RA; Hasegawa BH
J Nucl Med; 2005 May; 46(5):868-77. PubMed ID: 15872362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional reconstruction and modeling of middle ear biomechanics by high-resolution computed tomography and finite element analysis.
Lee CF; Chen PR; Lee WJ; Chen JH; Liu TC
Laryngoscope; 2006 May; 116(5):711-6. PubMed ID: 16652076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone formation after damaging in vivo fatigue loading results in recovery of whole-bone monotonic strength and increased fatigue life.
Silva MJ; Touhey DC
J Orthop Res; 2007 Feb; 25(2):252-61. PubMed ID: 17106875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Site specific bone adaptation response to mechanical loading.
Kuruvilla SJ; Fox SD; Cullen DM; Akhter MP
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact; 2008; 8(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 18398268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vivo fatigue loading of the rat ulna induces both bone formation and resorption and leads to time-related changes in bone mechanical properties and density.
Hsieh YF; Silva MJ
J Orthop Res; 2002 Jul; 20(4):764-71. PubMed ID: 12168665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does the degree of laminarity correlate with site-specific differences in collagen fibre orientation in primary bone? An evaluation in the turkey ulna diaphysis.
Skedros JG; Hunt KJ
J Anat; 2004 Aug; 205(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 15291795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modeling of cortical bone adaptation in a rat ulna: effect of frequency.
Chennimalai Kumar N; Dantzig JA; Jasiuk IM
Bone; 2012 Mar; 50(3):792-7. PubMed ID: 22210383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The establishment of a new mechanobiology model of bone and functional adaptation studies in vivo].
Chen XY; Zhang XZ; Zhang YL; Zhang CQ; Zhao HB; Zhang YH; Mao Y
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 May; 87(17):1160-4. PubMed ID: 17686232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating human long bone cross-sectional geometric properties: a comparison of noninvasive methods.
O'Neill MC; Ruff CB
J Hum Evol; 2004 Oct; 47(4):221-35. PubMed ID: 15454334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experimental validation of a finite element model of a human cadaveric tibia.
Gray HA; Taddei F; Zavatsky AB; Cristofolini L; Gill HS
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Jun; 130(3):031016. PubMed ID: 18532865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of a cuneiform-geometry implant.
Cruz M; Wassall T; Toledo EM; Barra LP; Lemonge AC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):675-84. PubMed ID: 14579955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional finite element modeling of ligaments: technical aspects.
Weiss JA; Gardiner JC; Ellis BJ; Lujan TJ; Phatak NS
Med Eng Phys; 2005 Dec; 27(10):845-61. PubMed ID: 16085446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Uniformity of resorptive bone loss induced by disuse.
Gross TS; Rubin CT
J Orthop Res; 1995 Sep; 13(5):708-14. PubMed ID: 7472749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Subject-specific finite element models implementing a maximum principal strain criterion are able to estimate failure risk and fracture location on human femurs tested in vitro.
Schileo E; Taddei F; Cristofolini L; Viceconti M
J Biomech; 2008; 41(2):356-67. PubMed ID: 18022179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
