These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7472771)

  • 1. [An analytical study on recognition confusion of vowels in patients with 22 channel cochlear implant].
    Momoi T
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1995 Aug; 98(8):1318-22. PubMed ID: 7472771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phoneme recognition and confusions with multichannel cochlear implants: vowels.
    Välimaa TT; Määttä TK; Löppönen HJ; Sorri MJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Oct; 45(5):1039-54. PubMed ID: 12381059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Place coding of vowel formants for cochlear implant patients.
    Blamey PJ; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):667-73. PubMed ID: 2212290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of cochlear implantation on vowel articulation.
    Hocevar-Boltezar I; Boltezar M; Zargi M
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2008; 120(7-8):228-33. PubMed ID: 18500598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Testing of synthetic vowels in patients with 22 channel cochlear implant].
    Saito H; Hakuhisa E; Watanabe K; Yukawa K; Sato T; Funasaka S
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1994 Nov; 97(11):2065-71. PubMed ID: 7823237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phoneme recognition by deaf individuals using the multichannel nucleus cochlear implant.
    Mülder HE; Van Olphen AF; Bosman A; Smoorenburg GF
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992 Nov; 112(6):946-55. PubMed ID: 1481665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Comparison of Persian Vowel Production in Hearing-Impaired Children Using a Cochlear Implant and Normal-Hearing Children.
    Jafari N; Drinnan M; Mohamadi R; Yadegari F; Nourbakhsh M; Torabinezhad F
    J Voice; 2016 May; 30(3):340-4. PubMed ID: 25990321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vowel perception: experiments with a single-electrode cochlear implant.
    Doyle KJ; Danhauer JL; Edgerton BJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):179-92. PubMed ID: 3755193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic Analysis of Persian Vowels in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison With Hearing-impaired Children Using Hearing Aid and Normal-hearing Children.
    Jafari N; Yadegari F; Jalaie S
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):763.e1-763.e7. PubMed ID: 26725549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of single-channel extracochlear and multichannel intracochlear electrodes in the same patient.
    Spillmann T; Dillier N
    Br J Audiol; 1989 Feb; 23(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 2706406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Synthetic vowel studies on cochlear implant patients.
    Tong YC; Lim HH; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Sep; 84(3):876-87. PubMed ID: 3183206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vowel confusion patterns in adults during initial 4 years of implant use.
    Välimaa TT; Sorri MJ; Laitakari J; Sivonen V; Muhli A
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2011 Feb; 25(2):121-44. PubMed ID: 21070135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of auditory feedback deprivation length on the vowel /epsilon/ produced by pediatric cochlear-implant users.
    Bharadwaj SV; Graves AG; Bauer DD; Assmann PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 May; 121(5 Pt1):EL196-202. PubMed ID: 17550203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changes in vowel quality after cochlear implantation.
    Schenk BS; Baumgartner WD; Hamzavi JS
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2003; 65(3):184-8. PubMed ID: 12925820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual "vowel spaces" of cochlear implant users: implications for the study of auditory adaptation to spectral shift.
    Harnsberger JD; Svirsky MA; Kaiser AR; Pisoni DB; Wright R; Meyer TA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2135-45. PubMed ID: 11386565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The recognition of vowels differing by a single formant by cochlear-implant subjects.
    Tyler RS; Tye-Murray N; Otto SR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Dec; 86(6):2107-12. PubMed ID: 2532227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vowel recognition via cochlear implants and noise vocoders: effects of formant movement and duration.
    Iverson P; Smith CA; Evans BG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Dec; 120(6):3998-4006. PubMed ID: 17225426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Saliency of Vowel Features in Neural Responses of Cochlear Implant Users.
    Prévost F; Lehmann A
    Clin EEG Neurosci; 2018 Nov; 49(6):388-397. PubMed ID: 29690785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.