These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7473081)

  • 21. Some statistical considerations on the FDA draft guidance for individual bioequivalence.
    Hsuan FC
    Stat Med; 2000 Oct; 19(20):2879-84. PubMed ID: 11033582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Definition of individual bioequivalence: occasion-to-occasion versus mean switchability.
    Kimanani EK
    Stat Med; 2000 Oct; 19(20):2797-810. PubMed ID: 11033576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Some thoughts on drug interchangeability.
    Chow SC; Song F; Chen M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(1):178-86. PubMed ID: 26366703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The transitivity of bioequivalence testing: potential for drift.
    Anderson S; Hauck WW
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1996 Sep; 34(9):369-74. PubMed ID: 8880284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Individual bioequivalence: what matters to the patient.
    Hauck WW; Anderson S
    Stat Med; 1991 Jun; 10(6):959; discussion 959-60. PubMed ID: 1876785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Connections between average and individual bioequivalence.
    Munk A
    Stat Med; 2000 Oct; 19(20):2843-54. PubMed ID: 11033579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Individual bioequivalence revisited.
    Chen ML; Lesko LJ
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2001; 40(10):701-6. PubMed ID: 11707058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Generics: need for clinical concern?
    Heller FR; Dupont AG
    Acta Clin Belg; 2009; 64(5):415-22. PubMed ID: 19999389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Towards a practical strategy for assessing individual bioequivalence. Food and Drug Administration Individual Bioequivalence Working Group.
    Schall R; Williams RL
    J Pharmacokinet Biopharm; 1996 Feb; 24(1):133-49. PubMed ID: 8827586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Consideration of individual bioequivalence.
    Anderson S; Hauck WW
    J Pharmacokinet Biopharm; 1990 Jun; 18(3):259-73. PubMed ID: 2380920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A two one-sided tests procedure for assessment of individual bioequivalence.
    Liu J; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Mar; 7(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 9056588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Generic lamotrigine versus brand-name Lamictal bioequivalence in patients with epilepsy: A field test of the FDA bioequivalence standard.
    Ting TY; Jiang W; Lionberger R; Wong J; Jones JW; Kane MA; Krumholz A; Temple R; Polli JE
    Epilepsia; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1415-24. PubMed ID: 26201987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Are the current bioequivalence standards sufficient for the acceptance of narrow therapeutic index drugs? Utilization of a computer simulated warfarin bioequivalence model.
    Walker SE; Friesen MH
    J Pharm Pharm Sci; 1999; 2(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 10951658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The bioequivalence of highly variable drugs and drug products.
    Midha KK; Rawson MJ; Hubbard JW
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2005 Oct; 43(10):485-98. PubMed ID: 16240706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Generics and cost-effective prescribing in Belgium: does bioequivalence always translate in therapeutic equivalence?
    Dupont AG; Heller F
    Acta Clin Belg; 2009; 64(5):406-14. PubMed ID: 19999388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Statistical aspects of bioequivalence testing between two medicinal products.
    Zintzaras E
    Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet; 2005; 30(1-2):41-6. PubMed ID: 16010860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Statistical evaluation of the scaled criterion for drug interchangeability.
    Li J; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(2):282-292. PubMed ID: 27937059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A three-step procedure for assessing bioequivalence in the general mixed model framework.
    Vuorinen J; Turunen J
    Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(24):2635-55. PubMed ID: 8981677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. International harmonization of bioequivalence studies and issues shared in common.
    Nakai K; Fujita M; Ogata H
    Yakugaku Zasshi; 2000 Nov; 120(11):1193-200. PubMed ID: 11190204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The use of asymmetric distributions in average bioequivalence.
    de Souza RM; Achcar JA; Martinez EZ; Mazucheli J
    Stat Med; 2016 Jul; 35(15):2525-42. PubMed ID: 26840012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.