BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7473450)

  • 1. Pipelle endometrial sampling. Sensitivity in the detection of endometrial cancer.
    Guido RS; Kanbour-Shakir A; Rulin MC; Christopherson WA
    J Reprod Med; 1995 Aug; 40(8):553-5. PubMed ID: 7473450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Endometrial brush biopsy for the diagnosis of endometrial cancer.
    Del Priore G; Williams R; Harbatkin CB; Wan LS; Mittal K; Yang GC
    J Reprod Med; 2001 May; 46(5):439-43. PubMed ID: 11396369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pipelle endometrial sampling in patients with known endometrial carcinoma.
    Stovall TG; Photopulos GJ; Poston WM; Ling FW; Sandles LG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Jun; 77(6):954-6. PubMed ID: 2030877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of Pipelle Mark II sampling in endometrial disease diagnosis.
    Polena V; Mergui JL; Zerat L; Sananes S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Oct; 134(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 17029754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of late luteal phase endometrial biopsies using the Novak curette or PIPELLE endometrial suction curette.
    Hill GA; Herbert CM; Parker RA; Wentz AC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Mar; 73(3 Pt 1):443-5. PubMed ID: 2915869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pipelle versus fractional curettage for the endometrial sampling in postmenopausal women.
    Bunyavejchevin S; Triratanachat S; Kankeow K; Limpaphayom KK
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Jun; 84 Suppl 1():S326-30. PubMed ID: 11529353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the Z-sampler and Novak endometrial biopsy instruments for in-office diagnosis of endometrial cancer.
    Larson DM; Krawisz BR; Johnson KK; Broste SK
    Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Jul; 54(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 8020841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of clonality and genetic alterations in endometrial pipelle biopsy and its surgical specimen counterpart.
    Esteller M; García A; Martínez-Palones JM; Xercavins J; Reventós J
    Lab Invest; 1997 Jan; 76(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 9010454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of endometrial biopsy with the endometrial Pipelle and Vabra aspirator.
    Kaunitz AM; Masciello A; Ostrowski M; Rovira EZ
    J Reprod Med; 1988 May; 33(5):427-31. PubMed ID: 3385697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Endometrial biopsy using the Tao Brush method. A study of 50 women in a general gynecologic practice.
    Yang GC; Wan LS
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Feb; 45(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 10710740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors influencing the detection of uterine cancer by suction curettage and endometrial brushing.
    Yang GC; Wan LS; Del Priore G
    J Reprod Med; 2002 Dec; 47(12):1005-10. PubMed ID: 12516318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vabra aspirator and pipelle endometrial suction curette. A comparison.
    Manganiello PD; Burrows LJ; Dain BJ; Gonzalez J
    J Reprod Med; 1998 Oct; 43(10):889-92. PubMed ID: 9800672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the Pipelle curette for endometrial biopsy.
    Henig I; Chan P; Tredway DR; Maw GM; Gullett AJ; Cheatwood M
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Oct; 34(10):786-9. PubMed ID: 2795561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Endometrial brush biopsy. An accurate outpatient method of detecting endometrial malignancy.
    Wu HH; Casto BD; Elsheikh TM
    J Reprod Med; 2003 Jan; 48(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 12611094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors affecting adequacy of Pipelle and Tao Brush endometrial sampling.
    Williams AR; Brechin S; Porter AJ; Warner P; Critchley HO
    BJOG; 2008 Jul; 115(8):1028-36. PubMed ID: 18651884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Incidence of endometrial carcinoma after hysterectomy for atypical hyperplasia or FIGO stage IA carcinoma diagnosed on endometrial biopsy or endometrial resection].
    Ploteau S; Squifflet JL; Berlière M; Marbaix E; Donnez J
    Bull Cancer; 2008 May; 95(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 18541521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison the Diagnostic Value of Dilatation and Curettage Versus Endometrial Biopsy by Pipelle--a Clinical Trial.
    Sanam M; Majid MM
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(12):4971-5. PubMed ID: 26163624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endometrial hyperplasia involving endometrial polyps: report of a series and discussion of the significance in an endometrial biopsy specimen.
    Kelly P; Dobbs SP; McCluggage WG
    BJOG; 2007 Aug; 114(8):944-50. PubMed ID: 17565613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of the Pipelle endometrial suction curette for timed endometrial biopsies.
    Check JH; Chase JS; Nowroozi K; Wu CH; Chern R
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Mar; 34(3):218-20. PubMed ID: 2724236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coexisting endometrial cancer in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia.
    Bilgin T; Ozuysal S; Ozan H; Atakan T
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Jun; 30(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 15210044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.