These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7474267)

  • 1. Complication rates as a measure of quality of care.
    Daley J; Iezzoni LI; Khuri SF
    JAMA; 1995 Dec; 274(21):1674-5. PubMed ID: 7474267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the complication rate as a measure of quality of care in coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
    Silber JH; Rosenbaum PR; Schwartz JS; Ross RN; Williams SV
    JAMA; 1995 Jul; 274(4):317-23. PubMed ID: 7609261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of risk-adjusted complication rates to compare hospitals performing coronary artery bypass surgery or angioplasty.
    Hartz AJ; Kuhn EM; Green R; Rimm AA
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1992; 8(3):524-38. PubMed ID: 1399335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing hospitals that perform coronary artery bypass surgery: the effect of outcome measures and data sources.
    Hartz AJ; Kuhn EM
    Am J Public Health; 1994 Oct; 84(10):1609-14. PubMed ID: 7943479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost and quality information and health care market reform.
    Foreman S; Kenkel D; Shea D
    Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 1995; 15():137-53. PubMed ID: 10163094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Update on Pennsylvania's HC4 and the use of data in marketing hospital services.
    QRC Advis; 1993 Jul; 9(9):1-3, 8. PubMed ID: 10126960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. STS data clarifies variables behind coronary artery bypass complication, mortality rates.
    Data Strateg Benchmarks; 1998 Nov; 2(11):172-4, 161. PubMed ID: 10387188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Newspaper defines role in publishing performance data.
    Steinbrook R
    QA Rev; 1990 May; 2(4):5. PubMed ID: 10113750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of complications on mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: evidence from New York State.
    Glance LG; Osler TM; Mukamel DB; Dick AW
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Jul; 134(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 17599486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcomes of concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting at teaching hospitals versus nonteaching hospitals.
    Gopaldas RR; Bakaeen FG; Dao TK; Coselli JS; LeMaire SA; Huh J; Chu D
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Mar; 143(3):648-55. PubMed ID: 21719032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationship between preventability of death after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and all-cause risk-adjusted mortality rates.
    Guru V; Tu JV; Etchells E; Anderson GM; Naylor CD; Novick RJ; Feindel CM; Rubens FD; Teoh K; Mathur A; Hamilton A; Bonneau D; Cutrara C; Austin PC; Fremes SE
    Circulation; 2008 Jun; 117(23):2969-76. PubMed ID: 18541752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Does nature of hospital financing influence early mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting?].
    González Santos JM
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2006 May; 59(5):414-7. PubMed ID: 16750137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Competition and the impact of online hospital report cards.
    Chou SY; Deily ME; Li S; Lu Y
    J Health Econ; 2014 Mar; 34():42-58. PubMed ID: 24463142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgical mortality as an indicator of hospital quality: the problem with small sample size.
    Dimick JB; Welch HG; Birkmeyer JD
    JAMA; 2004 Aug; 292(7):847-51. PubMed ID: 15315999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgical volume and outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Does it matter?
    Konety SH; Rosenthal GE; Vaughan-Sarrazin MS
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 May; 137(5):1116-23.e1. PubMed ID: 19379976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality, not volume, determines outcome of coronary artery bypass surgery in a university-based community hospital network.
    Kurlansky PA; Argenziano M; Dunton R; Lancey R; Nast E; Stewart A; Williams T; Zapolanski A; Chang H; Tingley J; Smith CR
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Feb; 143(2):287-93. PubMed ID: 22104669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Procedure rates and outcomes of coronary revascularization procedures in California and New York.
    Carey JS; Danielsen B; Gold JP; Rossiter SJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Jun; 129(6):1276-82. PubMed ID: 15942567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The appropriateness of use of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in New York State.
    Leape LL; Hilborne LH; Park RE; Bernstein SJ; Kamberg CJ; Sherwood M; Brook RH
    JAMA; 1993 Feb; 269(6):753-60. PubMed ID: 8423656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How to use risk-adjusted quality indicators to assess hospitals.
    DesHarnais SI; Forthman MT; Homa-Lowry JM; Wooster LD
    QRC Advis; 1997 Mar; 13(5):1, 6-8. PubMed ID: 10164986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Limitations of hospital volume as a measure of quality of care for coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
    Welke KF; Barnett MJ; Sarrazin MS; Rosenthal GE
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Dec; 80(6):2114-9. PubMed ID: 16305854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.