These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7474635)

  • 1. [Comparisons of histological grading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens in prostatic adenocarcinoma].
    Fujinami K; Satomi Y; Sugawara T; Ikeda I; Ohgo Y; Harada M
    Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Sep; 86(9):1460-5. PubMed ID: 7474635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gleason histologic grading of prostatic carcinoma. Correlations between biopsy and prostatectomy specimens.
    Mills SE; Fowler JE
    Cancer; 1986 Jan; 57(2):346-9. PubMed ID: 3942967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The accuracy of diagnostic biopsy specimens in predicting tumor grades by Gleason's classification of radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Garnett JE; Oyasu R; Grayhack JT
    J Urol; 1984 Apr; 131(4):690-3. PubMed ID: 6708183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Heterogeneity of Gleason grade in multifocal adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
    Arora R; Koch MO; Eble JN; Ulbright TM; Li L; Cheng L
    Cancer; 2004 Jun; 100(11):2362-6. PubMed ID: 15160339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Correlation between histologic grading and prognosis of prostatic cancer--comparing the grading system of the Japanese general rules of prostatic cancer with Gleason's grading].
    Hioki T; Sugimura Y; Sakurai M; Hayashi N; Tochigi H; Kawamura J; Yatani R
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1990 Aug; 36(8):921-6. PubMed ID: 2239593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictors of Gleason pattern 4/5 prostate cancer on prostatectomy specimens: can high grade tumor be predicted preoperatively?
    Rubin MA; Mucci NR; Manley S; Sanda M; Cushenberry E; Strawderman M; Montie JE; Bassily NH
    J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 11125378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of Gleason grading system in comparing prostate biopsies with total prostatectomy specimens.
    Babaian RJ; Grunow WA
    Urology; 1985 Jun; 25(6):564-7. PubMed ID: 4012946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
    Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
    J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prostatic adenocarcinoma with atrophic features: malignancy mimicking a benign process.
    Egan AJ; Lopez-Beltran A; Bostwick DG
    Am J Surg Pathol; 1997 Aug; 21(8):931-5. PubMed ID: 9255256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Correlation between histological grading and the prognosis of prostatic carcinoma--a comparative study of the Japanese General Rules of Prostatic Cancer (JGRPC) and Gleason's classification].
    Uchida T; Go M; Nakajo H; Takagi Y; Murayama M; Honda N; Igarashi M; Ishibashi A; Koshiba K
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1988 Jan; 34(1):116-22. PubMed ID: 3376792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Cheng L; Poulos CK; Pan CX; Jones TD; Daggy JK; Eble JN; Koch MO
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 16093983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation of the primary Gleason pattern on prostate needle biopsy with clinico-pathological factors in Gleason 7 tumors.
    Grober ED; Tsihlias J; Jewett MA; Sweet JM; Evans AJ; Trachtenberg J; Robinette M; Nam RK
    Can J Urol; 2004 Feb; 11(1):2157-62. PubMed ID: 15003158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The volume of prostate cancer in the biopsy specimen cannot reliably predict the quantity of cancer in the radical prostatectomy specimen on an individual basis.
    Cupp MR; Bostwick DG; Myers RP; Oesterling JE
    J Urol; 1995 May; 153(5):1543-8. PubMed ID: 7714976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
    Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
    Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gleason scores in prostate needle biopsy and prostatectomy specimens in prostatic adenocarcinoma: A correlation study.
    Awang A; Md Isa N; Yunus R; Azhar Shah S; Md Pauzi SH
    Malays J Pathol; 2019 Dec; 41(3):253-257. PubMed ID: 31901909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Reproducibility of malignancy grading in prostatic cancers using the Gleason-Böckling system].
    Kiss F; Lakner G; Csellár M; Nagy P; Tóth A; Vittay G
    Orv Hetil; 1997 May; 138(19):1195-9. PubMed ID: 9235527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Probability based diagnostic biopsy specimens as predictors of tumor grade and stage found.
    Tsui KH; Shen BY; Sun GH; Lee SH; Chang PL
    Arch Androl; 2004; 50(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 15551747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discrepancies between Gleason scores of needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Fukagai T; Namiki T; Namiki H; Carlile RG; Shimada M; Yoshida H
    Pathol Int; 2001 May; 51(5):364-70. PubMed ID: 11422794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discrepancy between Gleason scores of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Köksal IT; Ozcan F; Kadioglu TC; Esen T; Kiliçaslan I; Tunç M
    Eur Urol; 2000 Jun; 37(6):670-4. PubMed ID: 10828666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of prostate biopsies for predicting Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens: nationwide trends 2000-2012.
    Danneman D; Drevin L; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Robinson D; Bratt O; Loeb S; Stattin P; Egevad L
    BJU Int; 2017 Jan; 119(1):50-56. PubMed ID: 26918298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.