These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7474983)

  • 1. Derivation of frequency-gain characteristics for maximizing speech reception in noise.
    Rankovic CM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Aug; 38(4):913-29. PubMed ID: 7474983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility.
    Johnson EE; Dillon H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):441-59. PubMed ID: 21993050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sound quality and speech reception for prescribed hearing aid frequency responses.
    Leijon A; Lindkvist A; Ringdahl A; Israelsson B
    Ear Hear; 1991 Aug; 12(4):251-60. PubMed ID: 1783227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maximizing effective audibility in hearing aid fitting.
    Ching TY; Dillon H; Katsch R; Byrne D
    Ear Hear; 2001 Jun; 22(3):212-24. PubMed ID: 11409857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the NAL(R) and Cambridge formulae for the fitting of linear hearing aids.
    Peters RW; Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Feb; 34(1):21-36. PubMed ID: 10759075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Task-Dependent Effects of Signal Audibility for Processing Speech: Comparing Performance With NAL-NL2 and DSL v5 Hearing Aid Prescriptions at Threshold and at Suprathreshold Levels in 9- to 17-Year-Olds With Hearing Loss.
    Pittman AL; Stewart EC
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231177509. PubMed ID: 37254534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Children's speech recognition and loudness perception with the Desired Sensation Level v5 Quiet and Noise prescriptions.
    Crukley J; Scollie SD
    Am J Audiol; 2012 Dec; 21(2):149-62. PubMed ID: 22617498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comfortable loudness level: stimulus effects, long-term reliability, and predictability.
    Cox RM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Dec; 32(4):816-28. PubMed ID: 2601312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of equating loudness on audibility-based hearing aid selection procedures.
    Studebaker GA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Mar; 3(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 1600213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech enhancement by filtering in the loudness domain.
    Kollmeier B
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():207-14. PubMed ID: 2356729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A model to evaluate and maximize hearing aid performance by integrating the articulation index across listening conditions.
    Hou Z; Thornton AR
    Ear Hear; 1994 Feb; 15(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 8194674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hearing aid selection for the 1990s: where to?
    Byrne D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1996 Dec; 7(6):377-95. PubMed ID: 8972440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Villchur revisited: another look at automatic gain control simulation of recruiting hearing loss.
    Duchnowski P; Zurek PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3170-81. PubMed ID: 8550941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Noise analysis of real-life listening situations for maximal speech audibility in hearing aid fitting.
    Köbler S; Leijon A
    Scand Audiol; 1999; 28(3):179-89. PubMed ID: 10489867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting the effect of hearing loss and audibility on amplified speech reception in a multi-talker listening scenario.
    Woods WS; Kalluri S; Pentony S; Nooraei N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):4268-78. PubMed ID: 23742377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of digital signal processing features on children's speech recognition and loudness perception.
    Crukley J; Scollie SD
    Am J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 23(1):99-115. PubMed ID: 24018572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Children's speech perception and loudness ratings when fitted with hearing aids using the DSL v.4.1 and the NAL-NL1 prescriptions.
    Scollie SD; Ching TY; Seewald RC; Dillon H; Britton L; Steinberg J; King K
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jan; 49 Suppl 1():S26-34. PubMed ID: 20109085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope.
    Festen JM; van Dijkhuizen JN; Plomp R
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. NAL-NL2 Prescriptive Targets for Bone Conduction Devices With an Adaptation to Device Constraints in the Low Frequencies.
    Toll M; Dingemanse G
    Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1721-1729. PubMed ID: 35622973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the efficacy of hearing-aid amplification using a phoneme test.
    Scheidiger C; Allen JB; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1739. PubMed ID: 28372055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.