These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7475391)

  • 1. Individually shaped volume conductor models of the head in EEG source localisation.
    Zanow F; Peters MJ
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1995 Jul; 33(4):582-8. PubMed ID: 7475391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of volume conductor and source models to localize epileptic foci.
    Fuchs M; Wagner M; Kastner J
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 24(2):101-19. PubMed ID: 17414966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of EEG dipole source localisation in presence of brain lesions.
    Vatta F; Bruno P; Inchingolo P
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2000; 36():403-8. PubMed ID: 10834266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A standardized boundary element method volume conductor model.
    Fuchs M; Kastner J; Wagner M; Hawes S; Ebersole JS
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 May; 113(5):702-12. PubMed ID: 11976050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inverse solutions based on MEG and EEG applied to volume conductor analysis.
    Stok CJ; Meijs JW; Peters MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1987 Jan; 32(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 3823146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of head shape variations among individuals on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse problems.
    von Ellenrieder N; Muravchik CH; Wagner M; Nehorai A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Mar; 56(3):587-97. PubMed ID: 19389682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental tests of EEG source localization accuracy in realistically shaped head models.
    Cuffin BN; Schomer DL; Ives JR; Blume H
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Dec; 112(12):2288-92. PubMed ID: 11738201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of cavities on EEG dipole localization and their relations with surface electrode positions.
    He B; Musha T
    Int J Biomed Comput; 1989 Dec; 24(4):269-82. PubMed ID: 2606568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of blood vessels in high-resolution volume conductor head modeling of EEG.
    Fiederer LDJ; Vorwerk J; Lucka F; Dannhauer M; Yang S; Dümpelmann M; Schulze-Bonhage A; Aertsen A; Speck O; Wolters CH; Ball T
    Neuroimage; 2016 Mar; 128():193-208. PubMed ID: 26747748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Review on solving the forward problem in EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Grech R; Muscat J; De Clercq W; Vergult A; D'Asseler Y; Camilleri KP; Fabri SG; Van Huffel S; Lemahieu I
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2007 Nov; 4():46. PubMed ID: 18053144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Forward and inverse problems of EEG dipole localization.
    Musha T; Okamoto Y
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1999; 27(3-5):189-239. PubMed ID: 10864280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of the head model on EEG and MEG source connectivity analyses.
    Cho JH; Vorwerk J; Wolters CH; Knösche TR
    Neuroimage; 2015 Apr; 110():60-77. PubMed ID: 25638756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How well does a three-sphere model predict positions of dipoles in a realistically shaped head?
    Roth BJ; Balish M; Gorbach A; Sato S
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 Oct; 87(4):175-84. PubMed ID: 7691548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A guideline for head volume conductor modeling in EEG and MEG.
    Vorwerk J; Cho JH; Rampp S; Hamer H; Knösche TR; Wolters CH
    Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 100():590-607. PubMed ID: 24971512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Models and computation methods of EEG forward problem].
    Zhang Y; Zou L; Zhu S
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Apr; 21(2):337-9. PubMed ID: 15143572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The FieldTrip-SimBio pipeline for EEG forward solutions.
    Vorwerk J; Oostenveld R; Piastra MC; Magyari L; Wolters CH
    Biomed Eng Online; 2018 Mar; 17(1):37. PubMed ID: 29580236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bioelectromagnetic forward problem: isolated source approach revis(it)ed.
    Stenroos M; Sarvas J
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(11):3517-35. PubMed ID: 22581305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of dipole position, orientation and noise on the accuracy of EEG source localization.
    Whittingstall K; Stroink G; Gates L; Connolly JF; Finley A
    Biomed Eng Online; 2003 Jun; 2():14. PubMed ID: 12807534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EEG localization accuracy improvements using realistically shaped head models.
    Cuffin BN
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1996 Mar; 43(3):299-303. PubMed ID: 8682542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Realistic and spherical head modeling for EEG forward problem solution: a comparative cortex-based analysis.
    Vatta F; Meneghini F; Esposito F; Mininel S; Di Salle F
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2010; 2010():972060. PubMed ID: 20169107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.