These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7475523)

  • 1. [Supposedly, calcium channel blockers cause infarction. Then the Bayer company took over the press conference].
    Werkö L
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Oct; 92(43):3982, 3985. PubMed ID: 7475523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Bayer and calcium blockers].
    Lindeberg S
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Nov; 92(47):4404. PubMed ID: 7500697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do calcium channel blockers increase heart attack risk?
    Johns Hopkins Med Lett Health After 50; 1998 Nov; 10(9):8. PubMed ID: 9803183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do calcium channel blockers increase the risk of myocardial infarction in hypertensive patients with diabetes mellitus?
    Park L; Por CP; Evans MF
    Can Fam Physician; 1998 Nov; 44():2405-7. PubMed ID: 9839057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Safety of calcium channel blockers in cardiovascular disease.
    Langer A
    Circulation; 1998 Dec 22-29; 98(25):2933. PubMed ID: 9860799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Treatment of hypertension with calcium antagonists and increased risk of acute myocardial infarction: reliable results?].
    Jensen G
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1995 Oct; 157(41):5732. PubMed ID: 7571114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Calcium channel antagonists revisited.
    Birbari AE
    J Med Liban; 1996; 44(2):59. PubMed ID: 9057438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Calcium channel blockers and myocardial infarction.
    Smith GN
    J Fam Pract; 1996 Jan; 42(1):30-2. PubMed ID: 8537801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Renewed discussion on calcium antagonists in hypertension. More myocardial infarcts?].
    Einecke D
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2000 Sep; 142(37):8-9. PubMed ID: 11026215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Calcium antagonists--much noise about nothing?].
    Oberpichler-Schwenk H
    Med Monatsschr Pharm; 1995 Dec; 18(12):344-9. PubMed ID: 8569586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The safety of calcium-channel blockers.
    Massie BM
    Clin Cardiol; 1998 Dec; 21(12 Suppl 2):II12-7. PubMed ID: 9853194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Calcium channel blockers and associated risk of myocardial infarction.
    S Afr Med J; 1996 Apr; 86 Suppl 2():C114-5. PubMed ID: 8711575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Safety of calcium antagonists: more ACTION.
    Messerli FH; Staessen JA
    Am J Med; 2005 Dec; 118(12):1418-20. PubMed ID: 16378803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enough to raise one's blood pressure.
    Meyer CR
    Minn Med; 1995 May; 78(5):2. PubMed ID: 7791723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bruce Psaty and the risks of calcium channel blockers.
    Deyo RA
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2002 Sep; 11(3):294-6. PubMed ID: 12486998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. From the LSMS Committee on Chronic Diseases. Recent media reports of potential risks from calcium antagonists.
    Frohlich ED
    J La State Med Soc; 1995 Aug; 147(8):343. PubMed ID: 7673778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Safety of calcium-channel blockers.
    Med Lett Drugs Ther; 1997 Feb; 39(994):13-4. PubMed ID: 9040648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [We don't receive sufficient information about calcium blockers and other drugs].
    Lindeberg S
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Oct; 92(43):3977. PubMed ID: 7475518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Calcium channel blockers in the dock: innocent or guilty?
    Mackay JA; Sever PS
    J Hum Hypertens; 1996 May; 10(5):277-80. PubMed ID: 8817399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The pressure's on. A hypertension drug taken by 28 million people is under scrutiny. What are the other options?
    Smith IK
    Time; 2000 Sep; 156(11):126. PubMed ID: 11067229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.