These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7476007)

  • 1. In re Baby K.
    Rhodes AM
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 1995; 20(5):251. PubMed ID: 7476007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medical futility: when is enough, enough?
    Cultice PN
    J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Aug; 27(8):225-32, 256. PubMed ID: 10171943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A legal challenge to the refusal to provide inappropriate treatment: the case of Baby K.
    Watson SB
    Clin Ethics Rep; 1994; 8(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11652775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Child abuse by whom? -- Parental rights and judicial competency determinations: the Baby K and Baby Terry cases.
    Bopp J; Coleson RE
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1994; 20(4):821-46. PubMed ID: 11652997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In the matter of Baby K: implications for hospital administration.
    Darr K
    Hosp Top; 1995; 73(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 10184331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Talking about Baby K's fate.
    Scofield GR
    Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1994; 9(1):13-6, 46. PubMed ID: 7950137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Baby Ryan and virtual futility.
    Capron AM
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(2):20-1. PubMed ID: 7782197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The medical futility debate continues.
    Struthers MS; Olson BC
    Minn Med; 1995 Feb; 78(2):29-32. PubMed ID: 7891646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The tyranny of technology: the case of Baby K.
    Benesch K
    Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1994; 9(1):47-8. PubMed ID: 7950149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conjoined twins: the conflict between parents and the courts over the medical treatment of children.
    Tierney H
    Denver J Int Law Policy; 2002; 30(4):458-75. PubMed ID: 15233119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Infants with anencephaly, the ADA, and the Child Abuse Amendments.
    Crossley M
    Issues Law Med; 1996; 11(4):379-410. PubMed ID: 8934859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. It's time to get serious about defining futility.
    Nevins MA
    Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1994; 9(1):31-2, 36. PubMed ID: 7950142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abandoning a waning life.
    Capron AM
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(4):24-6. PubMed ID: 7591722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ten bad reasons for not treating Baby K.
    Fost N
    Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1994; 9(1):17-8, 22. PubMed ID: 7950138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In re Baby K.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1994 Feb; 16():590-9. PubMed ID: 11648610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Futile treatment: the need for legislation and uniform policies.
    Isackson C
    Health Care Law Newsl; 1994 Oct; 9(10):7-11. PubMed ID: 10137764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anencephalic newborns: legal and ethical comments regarding the matter of Baby "K".
    Fry-Revere S
    Pediatr Nurs; 1994; 20(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 8008479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nguyen v. Sacred Heart Medical Center.
    Altomare J; Bolde M
    Issues Law Med; 1995; 11(2):199-201. PubMed ID: 7591667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medicine without end?
    Caplan AL
    Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1994; 9(1):37-8. PubMed ID: 7950144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [How alibis cost dearly in the USA--the case of Baby K].
    Horák P
    Cas Lek Cesk; 1995 Mar; 134(5):150. PubMed ID: 7728842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.