These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
32 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7476151)
1. [Current status and progress of detection methods for common clinical toxicants]. Luo HY; Hou JX; Yao DQ Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2024 Jul; 42(7):551-557. PubMed ID: 39075013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dermal and inhalation acute toxic class methods: test procedures and biometric evaluations for the Globally Harmonized Classification System. Holzhütter HG; Genschow E; Diener W; Schlede E Arch Toxicol; 2003 May; 77(5):243-54. PubMed ID: 12734637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparative studies on the usefulness of using a fixed dose and a stepwise method of dosing for evaluating acute chemical toxicity]. Krysiak B; Rydzyński K Med Pr; 1997; 48(5):561-78. PubMed ID: 9501339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modelling acute oral mammalian toxicity. 1. Definition of a quantifiable baseline effect. Koleva YK; Cronin MT; Madden JC; Schwöbel JA Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Oct; 25(7):1281-93. PubMed ID: 21557997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The biometrical evaluation of the OECD modified version of the acute toxic class method (oral). Diener W; Mischke U; Schlede E; Kayser D Arch Toxicol; 1995; 69(10):729-34. PubMed ID: 8572934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Threshold of toxicological concern values for non-genotoxic effects in industrial chemicals: re-evaluation of the Cramer classification. Kalkhof H; Herzler M; Stahlmann R; Gundert-Remy U Arch Toxicol; 2012 Jan; 86(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 21735231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A new method for evaluating acute toxicity intragastrically for classification of chemical substances]. Rydzyński K; Krysiak B Med Pr; 1995; 46(4):369-83. PubMed ID: 7476151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Criteria for classifying chemical substances according to toxicity: carcinogens, irritants, corrosives, allergens, fetotoxins and those absorbed through the skin]. Czerczak S; Kupczewska M Med Pr; 1998; 49(1):67-81. PubMed ID: 9587913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Prospects of the use of a quantitative functional-morphological method in the evaluation of toxicity of chemical substances]. Popuchiyev VV Med Tr Prom Ekol; 1995; (12):24-7. PubMed ID: 8673382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Health effects classification and its role in the derivation of minimal risk levels: hepatic effects. Pohl HR; Chou CH Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Jul; 42(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 15869832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The integrated project ReProTect: a novel approach in reproductive toxicity hazard assessment. Hareng L; Pellizzer C; Bremer S; Schwarz M; Hartung T Reprod Toxicol; 2005; 20(3):441-52. PubMed ID: 15899576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials. EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]