These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
10. Perspectives. States and Feds struggle to mesh care for dual eligibles. Buntin J Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1996 Apr; 50(17):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10156155 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Minnesota will lose federal Medicaid money. Minn Med; 1995 Dec; 78(12):35. PubMed ID: 8569652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Maximum-strength health care. Ludeman C Minn Med; 2004 Oct; 87(10):40-2. PubMed ID: 15559100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Minnesota Care likely to survive Federal reform. An assessment by Minnesota's Health Commissioner. O'Brien MJ Minn Med; 1993 Dec; 76(12):21-3. PubMed ID: 8127292 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. State health reform. Mollica RL Empl Benefits J; 1995 Dec; 20(4):2-9. PubMed ID: 10153604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minnesota health care provider cooperatives. Matthews JS Minn Med; 1994 Oct; 77(10):45-7. PubMed ID: 7990780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Do we have to sacrifice access and quality to cut costs? Bradley F Minn Med; 2004 Oct; 87(10):35, 52. PubMed ID: 15559097 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Access to care--should there be winners and losers? Gonzalez-Campoy JM Minn Med; 2005 Apr; 88(4):15. PubMed ID: 15940886 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Why reform the health care system? Silversmith JL; Gloege K Minn Med; 1994 May; 77(5):19-23. PubMed ID: 8022377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Wellstone and Ramstad debate health care issues -news-. Minn Med; 1996 Apr; 79(4):35. PubMed ID: 8637489 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]