These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7478035)

  • 1. A comparative study of digital images versus 35-millimeter images.
    Wilcox LA; Grimwood RE
    Mil Med; 1995 Sep; 160(9):470-2. PubMed ID: 7478035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Focusing and depth of field in photography: application in dermatology practice.
    Taheri A; Yentzer BA; Feldman SR
    Skin Res Technol; 2013 Nov; 19(4):394-7. PubMed ID: 23528235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Photography in dermatology: a dermatologist's perspective.
    London K
    J Vis Commun Med; 2010 Dec; 33(4):188-90. PubMed ID: 21087191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The uses of digital photography in dermatology.
    Ratner D; Thomas CO; Bickers D
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1999 Nov; 41(5 Pt 1):749-56. PubMed ID: 10534639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selecting the right digital camera for telemedicine-choice for 2009.
    Patricoski C; Ferguson AS; Brudzinski J; Spargo G
    Telemed J E Health; 2010 Mar; 16(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 20082591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Technology and Technique Standards for Camera-Acquired Digital Dermatologic Images: A Systematic Review.
    Quigley EA; Tokay BA; Jewell ST; Marchetti MA; Halpern AC
    JAMA Dermatol; 2015 Aug; 151(8):883-90. PubMed ID: 25970844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic accuracy and image quality using a digital camera for teledermatology.
    Krupinski EA; LeSueur B; Ellsworth L; Levine N; Hansen R; Silvis N; Sarantopoulos P; Hite P; Wurzel J; Weinstein RS; Lopez AM
    Telemed J; 1999; 5(3):257-63. PubMed ID: 10908439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Basic digital photography in dermatology.
    Kaliyadan F; Manoj J; Venkitakrishnan S; Dharmaratnam AD
    Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2008; 74(5):532-6. PubMed ID: 19052435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital imaging in clinical dermatology across the UK in the year 2001.
    Strauss RM; Goodfield MJ
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2003 May; 17(3):285-7. PubMed ID: 12702066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital camera images obtained using a light-emitting diode illuminator and their dermatological applications.
    Ahn HH; Kim SN; Kye YC
    Skin Res Technol; 2006 Feb; 12(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 16420533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Photography without film: low-cost digital cameras come of age in dermatology.
    Sasson M; Schiff T; Stiller MJ
    Int J Dermatol; 1994 Feb; 33(2):113-5. PubMed ID: 8157391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A picture is worth more than a thousand words: enhancement of a pre-exam telephone consultation in dermatology with digital images.
    Mann T; Colven R
    Acad Med; 2002 Jul; 77(7):742-3. PubMed ID: 12114161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital skin images submitted by patients: an evaluation of feasibility in store-and-forward teledermatology.
    Rimner T; Blozik E; Fischer Casagrande B; Von Overbeck J
    Eur J Dermatol; 2010; 20(5):606-10. PubMed ID: 20634171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consistent cutaneous imaging with commercial digital cameras.
    Vander Haeghen Y; Naeyaert JM
    Arch Dermatol; 2006 Jan; 142(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 16415385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical photography in the dermatology practice.
    Witmer WK; Lebovitz PJ
    Semin Cutan Med Surg; 2012 Sep; 31(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 22929357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the concordance of digital images, live examinations, and skin biopsies for the diagnosis of hospitalized dermatology consultation patients.
    Scheinfeld N; Kurz J; Teplitz E
    Skinmed; 2003; 2(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 14673320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
    Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital vs 35-mm photography. To convert or not to convert?
    Kokoska MS; Currens JW; Hollenbeak CS; Thomas JR; Stack BC
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 1999; 1(4):276-81. PubMed ID: 10937115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Thirty-five millimeter versus digital photography: comparison of photographic quality and clinical evaluation.
    Wall S; Kazahaya K; Becker SS; Becker DG
    Facial Plast Surg; 1999; 15(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 11816120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The skin is the body's largest organ.
    Swann G
    J Vis Commun Med; 2010 Dec; 33(4):148-9. PubMed ID: 21087182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.