296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7479170)
1. Initial clinical experience with a new dual sensor SSIR pacemaker controlled by body activity and minute ventilation.
Alt E; Combs W; Fotuhi P; Bambl E; Wahlstrand J; Willhaus R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Aug; 18(8):1487-95. PubMed ID: 7479170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative study of activity and dual sensor: activity and minute ventilation pacing responses to ascending and descending stairs.
Alt E; Combs W; Willhaus R; Condie C; Bambl E; Fotuhi P; Pache J; Schömig A
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Oct; 21(10):1862-8. PubMed ID: 9793080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New integrated sensor pacemaker: comparison of rate responses between an integrated minute ventilation and activity sensor and single sensor modes during exercise and daily activities and nonphysiological interference.
Leung SK; Lau CP; Tang MO; Leung Z
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1664-71. PubMed ID: 8945021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Benefits and limitations of rate adaptive pacing under laboratory and daily life conditions in patients with minute ventilation single chamber pacemakers.
Osswald S; Leiggener C; Buser PT; Pfisterer ME; Burckhardt D; Burkart F
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Jun; 19(6):890-8. PubMed ID: 8774818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two-year experience with rate-modulated pacing controlled by mixed venous oxygen saturation.
Windecker S; Bubien RS; Halperin L; Moore A; Kay GN
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jul; 21(7):1396-404. PubMed ID: 9670183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rate responsive pacing using a minute ventilation sensor.
Mond H; Strathmore N; Kertes P; Hunt D; Baker G
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Nov; 11(11 Pt 2):1866-74. PubMed ID: 2463560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How to program rate responsive pacemakers.
Greco EM; Guardini S; Ferrario M; Romano S
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Feb; 23(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 10709224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rate adaptive cardiac pacing using right ventricular venous oxygen saturation: quantification of chronotropic behavior during daily activities and maximal exercise.
Lau CP; Tai YT; Leung WH; Leung SK; Li JP; Wong CK; Lee IS; Yerich C; Erickson M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Dec; 17(12 Pt 1):2236-46. PubMed ID: 7885930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rate responsive cardiac pacing using a minute ventilation sensor.
Abrahamsen AM; Barvik S; Aarsland T; Dickstein K
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Aug; 16(8):1650-5. PubMed ID: 7690933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of continuously recorded sensor and sinus rates during daily life activities and standardized exercise testing: efficacy of automatically optimized rate adaptive dual sensor pacing to simulate sinus rhythm.
Lau CP; Leung SK; Guerola M; Crijns HJ
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1672-7. PubMed ID: 8945022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ventilation and heart rate response during exercise in normals: relevance for rate variable pacing.
Treese N; MacCarter D; Akbulut O; Coutinho M; Baez M; Liebrich A; Meyer J
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Aug; 16(8):1693-700. PubMed ID: 7690938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dual sensor VVIR mode pacing: is it worth it?
Sulke N; Tan K; Kamalvand K; Bostock J; Bucknall C
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 1):1560-7. PubMed ID: 8946451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of normal sinus rhythm and pacing rate in children with minute ventilation single chamber rate adaptive permanent pacemakers.
Celiker A; Ceviz N; Alehan D; Lenk MK; Ozme S
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Nov; 21(11 Pt 1):2100-4. PubMed ID: 9826863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Atrial arrhythmia management with sensor controlled atrial refractory period and automatic mode switching in patients with minute ventilation sensing dual chamber rate adaptive pacemakers.
Lau CP; Tai YT; Fong PC; Li JP; Chung FL
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Oct; 15(10 Pt 1):1504-14. PubMed ID: 1383962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of sensor selection on exercise stroke volume in pacemaker dependent patients.
Haennel RG; Logan T; Dunne C; Burgess J; Busse E
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Sep; 21(9):1700-8. PubMed ID: 9744431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the cardiopulmonary response to exercise in recipients of dual sensor DDDR pacemakers Versus a Healthy control group.
Page E; Defaye P; Bonnet JL; Durand C; Amblard A
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Jan; 26(1P2):239-43. PubMed ID: 12687820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of adaptive rate pacing controlled by a right ventricular impedance sensor on cardiac output in response to exercise.
Cook L; Hamilton D; Busse E; Tsang J; Garbe G; Wojcik W; Haennel R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Jan; 26(1P2):244-7. PubMed ID: 12687821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life].
Epperlein S; Kreft A; Siegert V; Liebrich A; Himmrich E; Treese N
Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 8693765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rate-adaptive cardiac pacing in children using a minute ventilation biosensor.
Yabek SM; Wernly J; Chick TW; Berman W; McWilliams B
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 2):2108-12. PubMed ID: 1704603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A blended sensor restores chronotropic response more favorably than an accelerometer alone in pacemaker patients: the LIFE study results.
Coman J; Freedman R; Koplan BA; Reeves R; Santucci P; Stolen KQ; Kraus SM; Meyer TE;
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Nov; 31(11):1433-42. PubMed ID: 18950301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
