BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7479188)

  • 1. Monkey pulpal response to adhesively luted indirect resin composite inlays.
    Inokoshi S; Shimada Y; Fujitani M; Otsuki M; Shono T; Onoe N; Morigami M; Takatsu T
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(3):111-8. PubMed ID: 7479188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monkey pulpal responses to conventional and adhesive luting cements.
    Inokoshi S; Fujitani M; Otsuki M; Sonoda H; Kitasako Y; Shimada Y; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 9610329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pulpal response to a newly developed MMA based resin cement for bonding tooth-colored indirect restorations.
    Seki Y; Shimada Y; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 17076029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
    Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of pulp responses to resin composites.
    Murray PE; Windsor LJ; Hafez AA; Stevenson RG; Cox CF
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 12760695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pulpal response to adhesive resin systems applied to acid-etched vital dentin: damp versus dry primer application.
    White KC; Cox CF; Kanka J; Dixon DL; Farmer JB; Snuggs HM
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Apr; 25(4):259-68. PubMed ID: 8058899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short-term reaction of exposed monkey pulp beneath adhesive resins.
    Kitasako Y; Inokoshi S; Fujitani M; Otsuki M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(6):308-17. PubMed ID: 9855854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pulpal response to dentin etched with 10% phosphoric acid.
    Gilpatrick RO; Johnson W; Moore D; Turner J
    Am J Dent; 1996 Jun; 9(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 9002803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pulpal response to a new light-cured composite placed in etched glass-ionomer lined cavities.
    Hosoda H; Inokoshi S; Shimada Y; Harnirattisai C; Otsuki M
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(4):122-9. PubMed ID: 1805180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Restorative pulpal and repair responses.
    Murray PE; About I; Franquin JC; Remusat M; Smith AJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Apr; 132(4):482-91. PubMed ID: 11315379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal seal comparisons between resin-bonded Class II porcelain inlays, posterior composite restorations, and direct composite resin inlays.
    Shortall AC; Baylis RL; Baylis MA; Grundy JR
    Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 2699418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites.
    Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of a "resin coating" on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays.
    Jayasooriya PR; Pereira PN; Nikaido T; Burrow MF; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 12540115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of hierarchical factors to guide clinical decision making for successful long-term pulp capping.
    Murray PE; Hafez AA; Smith AJ; Cox CF
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 12674361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pulpal response to a fluoride-releasing all-in-one resin bonding system.
    Sonoda H; Sasafuchi Y; Kitasako Y; Arakawa M; Otsuki M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):271-7. PubMed ID: 12022459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal adaptation of dentin bonded ceramic inlays: effects of bonding systems and luting resin composites.
    Haller B; Hässner K; Moll K
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):574-84. PubMed ID: 14531604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Immediate dentin sealing supports delayed restoration placement.
    Magne P; So WS; Cascione D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):166-74. PubMed ID: 17854617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.