These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 74796)

  • 21. Relationships among scores on infant tests for children with developmental problems.
    Erickson MT; Johnson NM; Campbell FA
    Am J Ment Defic; 1970 Jul; 75(1):102-4. PubMed ID: 4193621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predicting learning and other developmental disabilities: assessment of reproductive and caretaking variables.
    Molfese VJ; Holcomb LC
    Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser; 1989; 25(6):1-23. PubMed ID: 2481515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Construct validity of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children with mildly mentally retarded students.
    Obrzut A; Nelson RB; Obrzut JE
    Am J Ment Defic; 1987 Jul; 92(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 3618659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Very preterm birth is associated with disabilities in multiple developmental domains.
    van Baar AL; van Wassenaer AG; Briƫt JM; Dekker FW; Kok JH
    J Pediatr Psychol; 2005; 30(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 15784921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Psychological assessment of the mentally handicapped. 3. Assessment for learning.
    Hegarty JR
    Nurs Mirror Midwives J; 1976 Oct; 143(16):64-6. PubMed ID: 1049932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Stability and change over time in cognitive level of children with delays.
    Keogh BK; Bernheimer LP; Guthrie D
    Am J Ment Retard; 1997 Jan; 101(4):365-73. PubMed ID: 9017083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prediction of developmental outcome using a perinatal risk inventory.
    Scheiner AP; Sexton ME
    Pediatrics; 1991 Dec; 88(6):1135-43. PubMed ID: 1720234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Denver Developmental Screening Test compared with the Stanford-Binet test.
    Grant JA; Gittelsohn AM
    Health Serv Rep; 1972 May; 87(5):473-6. PubMed ID: 5031305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Difficulties in comparing outcomes of low-birthweight studies because of obsolescent test norms.
    Bill JM; Sykes DH; Hoy EA
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 1986 Apr; 28(2):244-7. PubMed ID: 3709994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The predictive validity of a simple two item developmental screening test for three year olds.
    Silva PA
    N Z Med J; 1981 Jan; 93(676):39-41. PubMed ID: 6164968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Infant assessment: stability of mental functioning in young retarded children.
    VanderVeer B; Schweid E
    Am J Ment Defic; 1974 Jul; 79(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 4432879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Performance of Down syndrome individuals on the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale.
    Silverstein AB; Legutki G; Friedman SL; Takayama DL
    Am J Ment Defic; 1982 Mar; 86(5):548-51. PubMed ID: 6214950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. IQ measurement in children with skeletal dysplasia.
    Rogers JG; Perry MA; Rosenberg LA
    Pediatrics; 1979 Jun; 63(6):894-7. PubMed ID: 450527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mental and motor development correlates in patients with end-stage biliary atresia awaiting liver transplantation.
    Stewart SM; Uauy R; Waller DA; Kennard BD; Andrews WS
    Pediatrics; 1987 Jun; 79(6):882-8. PubMed ID: 2438636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mental tests and fossils.
    Littman RA
    J Hist Behav Sci; 2004; 40(4):423-31. PubMed ID: 15378562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Developmental assessment tests: scope and limitations.
    Chaudhari S
    Indian Pediatr; 1996 Jul; 33(7):541-5. PubMed ID: 8979562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [The role of paramedical personnel in the detection, follow-up and rehabilitation of the handicapped child].
    Pop E
    Viata Med Rev Inf Prof Stiint Cadrelor Medii Sanit; 1988 Jul; 35(7):159-61. PubMed ID: 2477942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Predictive accuracy of the Miller assessment for preschoolers in children with prenatal drug exposure.
    Fulks MA; Harris SR
    Phys Occup Ther Pediatr; 2005; 25(1-2):17-37. PubMed ID: 15760822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Concurrent validity study of the Slosson Intelligence Test-Revised in mental retardation testing.
    Kunen S; Overstreet S; Salles C
    Ment Retard; 1996 Dec; 34(6):380-6. PubMed ID: 8990822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. From the Binet-Simon to the Wechsler-Bellevue: tracing the history of intelligence testing.
    Boake C
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2002 May; 24(3):383-405. PubMed ID: 11992219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.