These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7480229)

  • 1. Biodegradation of polyurethane foam, revisited, in the rat model.
    Sinclair TM; Kerrigan CL; Sampalis J
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1995 Nov; 96(6):1326-35. PubMed ID: 7480229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biodegradation of the polyurethane foam covering of breast implants.
    Sinclair TM; Kerrigan CL; Buntic R
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1993 Nov; 92(6):1003-13; discussion 1014. PubMed ID: 8234496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Histopathological reaction over prosthesis surface covered with silicone and polyurethane foam implanted in rats.
    Wagenführ-Júnior J; Ribas Filho JM; Nascimento MM; Ribas FM; Wanka MV; Godoi Ade L
    Acta Cir Bras; 2012 Dec; 27(12):866-73. PubMed ID: 23207753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Natural-Y Même polyurethane versus smooth silicone: analysis of the soft-tissue interaction from 3 days to 1 year in the rat animal model.
    Picha GJ; Goldstein JA; Stohr E
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1990 Jun; 85(6):903-16. PubMed ID: 2190246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tissue response to commercial silicone and polyurethane elastomers after different sterilization procedures.
    Zhang YZ; Bjursten LM; Freij-Larsson C; Kober M; Wesslén B
    Biomaterials; 1996 Dec; 17(23):2265-72. PubMed ID: 8968522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Polyurethane or silicone as long-term implant substance--a critical evaluation].
    Behrend D; Schmitz KP
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1993; 38(7-8):172-8. PubMed ID: 8400014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Polyurethane-covered mammary prosthesis: a nine year follow-up assessment.
    Szycher M; Siciliano AA
    J Biomater Appl; 1991 Apr; 5(4):282-322. PubMed ID: 1856784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electron and light microscopy examination of capsules around breast implants.
    Wagner H; Beller FK; Pfautsch M
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1977 Jul; 60(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 327493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of microgeometry, implant thickness and polyurethane chemistry on the foreign body response to subcutaneous implants.
    Ward WK; Slobodzian EP; Tiekotter KL; Wood MD
    Biomaterials; 2002 Nov; 23(21):4185-92. PubMed ID: 12194521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cellular responses to silicone and polyurethane prosthetic surfaces.
    Sank A; Chalabian-Baliozian J; Ertl D; Sherman R; Nimni M; Tuan TL
    J Surg Res; 1993 Jan; 54(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 8429633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Splenic response to silicon drain material following intraperitoneal implantation.
    Guo W; Willén R; Liu X; Odelius R; Carlén B
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1994 Dec; 28(12):1433-8. PubMed ID: 7876282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of biostability and morphology on host response of polyurethane-based soft tissue implants.
    Jayabalan M; Rathinam K
    Clin Mater; 1992; 11(1-4):179-91. PubMed ID: 10171560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Antioxidant inhibition of poly(carbonate urethane) in vivo biodegradation.
    Christenson EM; Anderson JM; Hiltner A
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Mar; 76(3):480-90. PubMed ID: 16278858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of silicone/polyurethane graft polymers as a means of eliminating surface cracking of polyurethane prostheses.
    Pinchuk L; Martin JB; Esquivel MC; MacGregor DC
    J Biomater Appl; 1988 Oct; 3(2):260-96. PubMed ID: 3204496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of a bacterial contamination on the formation of capsular contracture with polyurethane breast implants in comparison with textured silicone implants: an animal study.
    Bergmann PA; Tamouridis G; Lohmeyer JA; Mauss KL; Becker B; Knobloch J; Mailänder P; Siemers F
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Oct; 67(10):1364-70. PubMed ID: 24953446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biostability of a non-ether polyurethane.
    Capone CD
    J Biomater Appl; 1992 Oct; 7(2):108-29. PubMed ID: 1447699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calcification of polyurethanes implanted subdermally in rats is enhanced by calciphylaxis.
    Joshi RR; Underwood T; Frautschi JR; Phillips RE; Schoen FJ; Levy RJ
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1996 Jun; 31(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 8731208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tissue reactions to breast implants coated with polyurethane.
    Smahel J
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1978 Jan; 61(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 339248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Histologic comparison of breast implant shells with smooth, foam, and pillar microstructuring in a rat model from 1 day to 6 months.
    Batra M; Bernard S; Picha G
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1995 Feb; 95(2):354-63. PubMed ID: 7824615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surface modification of poly(ether urethane urea) with modified dehydroepiandrosterone for improved in vivo biostability.
    Christenson EM; Wiggins MJ; Anderson JM; Hiltner A
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2005 Apr; 73(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 15714496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.