BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7480678)

  • 1. Hepatic contrast enhancement at CT: influence of intravenous glucagon in a canine model.
    Warshauer DM; Hiken JN; Molina PL; Hackney SL; Bellinger DA; Lee JK
    Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):365-8. PubMed ID: 7480678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hepatic enhancement and metastatic lesion conspicuity on CT scans: influence of intravenous glucagon and oral CT contrast material.
    Warshauer DM; Wehmueller MD; Molina PL; Muller KE; DeLuca MC; Lee JK
    Radiology; 1997 Feb; 202(2):394-8. PubMed ID: 9015064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times.
    Herts BR; Paushter DM; Einstein DM; Zepp R; Friedman RA; Obuchowski N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multi-detector row helical CT of the liver: quantitative assessment of iodine concentration of intravenous contrast material on multiphasic CT--a prospective randomized study.
    Tsurusaki M; Sugimoto K; Fujii M; Sugimura K
    Radiat Med; 2004; 22(4):239-45. PubMed ID: 15468944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of injection rates of contrast material on arterial phase hepatic CT.
    Kim T; Murakami T; Takahashi S; Tsuda K; Tomoda K; Narumi Y; Oi H; Nakamura H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Aug; 171(2):429-32. PubMed ID: 9694469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contrast enhancement for whole-body screening using multidetector row helical CT: comparison between uniphasic and biphasic injection protocols.
    Awai K; Imuta M; Utsunomiya D; Nakaura T; Shamima S; Kawanaka K; Hori S; Yamashita Y
    Radiat Med; 2004; 22(5):303-9. PubMed ID: 15553010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hepatic enhancement during helical CT: a comparison of moderate rate uniphasic and biphasic contrast injection protocols.
    Birnbaum BA; Jacobs JE; Yin D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):853-8. PubMed ID: 7676980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic CT scanning of the normal canine liver: interpretation of time density curves resulting from an intravenous bolus injection of contrast material.
    Jaschke W; Lipton MJ; Boyd D; Moss AA; Cann C; Goldberg HI; Margulis AR; Sievers R
    Eur J Radiol; 1985 Nov; 5(4):256-60. PubMed ID: 2935396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Liver CT: a practical approach to dynamic contrast enhancement.
    Ditchfield MR; Gibson RN; Fairlie N
    Australas Radiol; 1992 Aug; 36(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 1445103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Effect of contrast material pushed with saline solution using dual injection on enhancement of aorta, portal vein, and liver parenchyma in multislice CT of the liver].
    Tatsugami F; Matsuki M; Kani H; Miyao M; Yoshikawa S; Narabayashi I
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Sep; 63(8):409-11. PubMed ID: 14587411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors influencing vascular and hepatic enhancement at CT: experimental study on injection protocol using a canine model.
    Han JK; Kim AY; Lee KY; Seo JB; Kim TK; Choi BI; Lhee CS; Han MC
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2000; 24(3):400-6. PubMed ID: 10864075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of saline pushing after contrast material injection in abdominal multidetector computed tomography with the use of different iodine concentrations.
    Tatsugami F; Matsuki M; Kani H; Tanikake M; Miyao M; Yoshikawa S; Narabayashi I
    Acta Radiol; 2006 Mar; 47(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 16604967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contrast material injection for hepatic helical computed tomography. Comparative study of five protocols.
    Hoeffel C; Legmann P; Girardot C; Bunouf P; Mezzi K; Bonnin A
    Invest Radiol; 1996 Aug; 31(8):467-71. PubMed ID: 8854192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimization of scan delay for routine abdominal 64-slice CT with body weight-adapted application of contrast material.
    Tschugunow A; Puesken M; Juergens KU; Beyer F; Buerke B; Seifarth H; Heindel W; Wessling J
    Rofo; 2009 Jul; 181(7):683-90. PubMed ID: 19241327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CT arterial portography of the abdomen: effect of injecting papaverine into the mesenteric artery on hepatic contrast enhancement.
    Soyer P; Lacheheb D; Levesque M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jun; 160(6):1213-5. PubMed ID: 8498218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between one-route and two-route injection for liver and aortic enhancement using MDCT.
    Okada M; Murakami T; Kumano S; Imaoka I; Shimono T; Ashikaga R; Hosono M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):W323-6. PubMed ID: 18492873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on pancreatic and hepatic helical CT.
    Tublin ME; Tessler FN; Cheng SL; Peters TL; McGovern PC
    Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 9885593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved uniformity of aortic enhancement with customized contrast medium injection protocols at CT angiography.
    Fleischmann D; Rubin GD; Bankier AA; Hittmair K
    Radiology; 2000 Feb; 214(2):363-71. PubMed ID: 10671582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimal timing of abdominal CT in children: relationship to injection rate.
    Kuhns LR
    Radiology; 1993 Oct; 189(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 8372218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contrast media in abdominal computed tomography: optimization of delivery methods.
    Han JK; Choi BI; Kim AY; Kim SJ
    Korean J Radiol; 2001; 2(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 11752966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.