These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7480678)

  • 1. Hepatic contrast enhancement at CT: influence of intravenous glucagon in a canine model.
    Warshauer DM; Hiken JN; Molina PL; Hackney SL; Bellinger DA; Lee JK
    Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):365-8. PubMed ID: 7480678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hepatic enhancement and metastatic lesion conspicuity on CT scans: influence of intravenous glucagon and oral CT contrast material.
    Warshauer DM; Wehmueller MD; Molina PL; Muller KE; DeLuca MC; Lee JK
    Radiology; 1997 Feb; 202(2):394-8. PubMed ID: 9015064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times.
    Herts BR; Paushter DM; Einstein DM; Zepp R; Friedman RA; Obuchowski N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multi-detector row helical CT of the liver: quantitative assessment of iodine concentration of intravenous contrast material on multiphasic CT--a prospective randomized study.
    Tsurusaki M; Sugimoto K; Fujii M; Sugimura K
    Radiat Med; 2004; 22(4):239-45. PubMed ID: 15468944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of injection rates of contrast material on arterial phase hepatic CT.
    Kim T; Murakami T; Takahashi S; Tsuda K; Tomoda K; Narumi Y; Oi H; Nakamura H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Aug; 171(2):429-32. PubMed ID: 9694469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contrast enhancement for whole-body screening using multidetector row helical CT: comparison between uniphasic and biphasic injection protocols.
    Awai K; Imuta M; Utsunomiya D; Nakaura T; Shamima S; Kawanaka K; Hori S; Yamashita Y
    Radiat Med; 2004; 22(5):303-9. PubMed ID: 15553010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hepatic enhancement during helical CT: a comparison of moderate rate uniphasic and biphasic contrast injection protocols.
    Birnbaum BA; Jacobs JE; Yin D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Oct; 165(4):853-8. PubMed ID: 7676980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic CT scanning of the normal canine liver: interpretation of time density curves resulting from an intravenous bolus injection of contrast material.
    Jaschke W; Lipton MJ; Boyd D; Moss AA; Cann C; Goldberg HI; Margulis AR; Sievers R
    Eur J Radiol; 1985 Nov; 5(4):256-60. PubMed ID: 2935396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Liver CT: a practical approach to dynamic contrast enhancement.
    Ditchfield MR; Gibson RN; Fairlie N
    Australas Radiol; 1992 Aug; 36(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 1445103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Effect of contrast material pushed with saline solution using dual injection on enhancement of aorta, portal vein, and liver parenchyma in multislice CT of the liver].
    Tatsugami F; Matsuki M; Kani H; Miyao M; Yoshikawa S; Narabayashi I
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Sep; 63(8):409-11. PubMed ID: 14587411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors influencing vascular and hepatic enhancement at CT: experimental study on injection protocol using a canine model.
    Han JK; Kim AY; Lee KY; Seo JB; Kim TK; Choi BI; Lhee CS; Han MC
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2000; 24(3):400-6. PubMed ID: 10864075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of saline pushing after contrast material injection in abdominal multidetector computed tomography with the use of different iodine concentrations.
    Tatsugami F; Matsuki M; Kani H; Tanikake M; Miyao M; Yoshikawa S; Narabayashi I
    Acta Radiol; 2006 Mar; 47(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 16604967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contrast material injection for hepatic helical computed tomography. Comparative study of five protocols.
    Hoeffel C; Legmann P; Girardot C; Bunouf P; Mezzi K; Bonnin A
    Invest Radiol; 1996 Aug; 31(8):467-71. PubMed ID: 8854192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimization of scan delay for routine abdominal 64-slice CT with body weight-adapted application of contrast material.
    Tschugunow A; Puesken M; Juergens KU; Beyer F; Buerke B; Seifarth H; Heindel W; Wessling J
    Rofo; 2009 Jul; 181(7):683-90. PubMed ID: 19241327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CT arterial portography of the abdomen: effect of injecting papaverine into the mesenteric artery on hepatic contrast enhancement.
    Soyer P; Lacheheb D; Levesque M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jun; 160(6):1213-5. PubMed ID: 8498218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between one-route and two-route injection for liver and aortic enhancement using MDCT.
    Okada M; Murakami T; Kumano S; Imaoka I; Shimono T; Ashikaga R; Hosono M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):W323-6. PubMed ID: 18492873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on pancreatic and hepatic helical CT.
    Tublin ME; Tessler FN; Cheng SL; Peters TL; McGovern PC
    Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 9885593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved uniformity of aortic enhancement with customized contrast medium injection protocols at CT angiography.
    Fleischmann D; Rubin GD; Bankier AA; Hittmair K
    Radiology; 2000 Feb; 214(2):363-71. PubMed ID: 10671582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimal timing of abdominal CT in children: relationship to injection rate.
    Kuhns LR
    Radiology; 1993 Oct; 189(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 8372218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contrast media in abdominal computed tomography: optimization of delivery methods.
    Han JK; Choi BI; Kim AY; Kim SJ
    Korean J Radiol; 2001; 2(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 11752966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.