504 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7480682)
1. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features.
Stomper PC; Herman S; Klippenstein DL; Winston JS; Edge SB; Arredondo MA; Mazurchuk RV; Blumenson LE
Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):387-95. PubMed ID: 7480682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative signal intensity measurements in dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR mammography.
Gribbestad IS; Nilsen G; Fjøsne HE; Kvinnsland S; Haugen OA; Rinck PA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 4(3):477-80. PubMed ID: 8061451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent.
Boetes C; Mus RD; Holland R; Barentsz JO; Strijk SP; Wobbes T; Hendriks JH; Ruys SH
Radiology; 1995 Dec; 197(3):743-7. PubMed ID: 7480749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast combined with pharmacokinetic analysis of gadolinium-DTPA uptake in the diagnosis of local recurrence of early stage breast carcinoma.
Mussurakis S; Buckley DL; Bowsley SJ; Carleton PJ; Fox JN; Turnbull LW; Horsman A
Invest Radiol; 1995 Nov; 30(11):650-62. PubMed ID: 8557506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis.
Buadu LD; Murakami J; Murayama S; Hashiguchi N; Sakai S; Masuda K; Toyoshima S; Kuroki S; Ohno S
Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):639-49. PubMed ID: 8756909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast MR imaging with commercially available techniques: radiologic-pathologic correlation.
Fobben ES; Rubin CZ; Kalisher L; Dembner AG; Seltzer MH; Santoro EJ
Radiology; 1995 Jul; 196(1):143-52. PubMed ID: 7784558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CE-Magnetic Resonance Mammography for the evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed breast cancer.
Pediconi F; Venditti F; Padula S; Roselli A; Moriconi E; Giacomelli L; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2005; 110(1-2):61-8. PubMed ID: 16163140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation.
Orel SG; Schnall MD; LiVolsi VA; Troupin RH
Radiology; 1994 Feb; 190(2):485-93. PubMed ID: 8284404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clustered breast microcalcifications: evaluation by dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI.
Gilles R; Meunier M; Lucidarme O; Zafrani B; Guinebretière JM; Tardivon AA; Le Gal M; Vanel D; Neuenschwander S; Arriagada R
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1996; 20(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 8576489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Invasive breast carcinoma: analysis of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging enhancement features and cell proliferative activity determined by DNA S-phase percentage.
Stomper PC; Herman S; Klippenstein DL; Winston JS; Budnick RM; Stewart CC
Cancer; 1996 May; 77(9):1844-9. PubMed ID: 8646683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with i.v., gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
Low RN; Francis IR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1051-9. PubMed ID: 9308464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Ductal carcinoma in situ in dynamic MR-mammography at 1.5 T].
Fischer U; Westerhof JP; Brinck U; Korabiowska M; Schauer A; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1996 Apr; 164(4):290-4. PubMed ID: 8645861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic MR mammography: a technique for potentially reducing the biopsy rate for benign breast disease.
Turkat TJ; Klein BD; Polan RL; Richman RH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 4(4):563-8. PubMed ID: 7949682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast lesions: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging and with T2*-weighted first-pass perfusion MR imaging.
Kvistad KA; Rydland J; Vainio J; Smethurst HB; Lundgren S; Fjøsne HE; Haraldseth O
Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):545-53. PubMed ID: 10924584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR imaging of peritoneal disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled and spin-echo imaging.
Low RN; Sigeti JS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1131-40. PubMed ID: 7976889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional RODEO breast MR imaging of lesions containing ductal carcinoma in situ.
Soderstrom CE; Harms SE; Copit DS; Evans WP; Savino DA; Krakos PA; Farrell RS; Flamig DP
Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):427-32. PubMed ID: 8888235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA enhancement: comparison with mammography and ultrasonography.
Hachiya J; Seki T; Okada M; Nitatori T; Korenaga T; Furuya Y
Radiat Med; 1991; 9(6):232-40. PubMed ID: 1668410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. False-positive results in dynamic MR mammography. Causes, frequency, and methods to avoid.
Kaiser WA
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):539-55. PubMed ID: 7489307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast lesion localization: a freehand, interactive MR imaging-guided technique.
Daniel BL; Birdwell RL; Ikeda DM; Jeffrey SS; Black JW; Block WF; Sawyer-Glover AM; Glover GH; Herfkens RJ
Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):455-63. PubMed ID: 9577495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patterns of peripheral enhancement in breast masses: correlation of findings on contrast medium enhanced MRI with histologic features and tumor angiogenesis.
Buadu LD; Murakami J; Murayama S; Hashiguchi N; Sakai S; Toyoshima S; Masuda K; Kuroki S; Ohno S
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1997; 21(3):421-30. PubMed ID: 9135652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
