504 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7480682)
21. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Berg WA; Gutierrez L; NessAiver MS; Carter WB; Bhargavan M; Lewis RS; Ioffe OB
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):830-49. PubMed ID: 15486214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Morphology and contrast enhancement of ductal carcinoma in situ in dynamic 1.0 T MR mammography].
Sittek H; Kessler M; Heuck AF; Bredl T; Perlet C; Künzer I; Lebeau A; Untch M; Reiser M
Rofo; 1997 Sep; 167(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 9376552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: comparison of two different doses of gadopentetate dimeglumine.
Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Haustein J; Pohl C; Beck R; Lommatzsch B; Untch M; Nathrath WB
Radiology; 1994 Jun; 191(3):639-46. PubMed ID: 8184040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Padula S; Altomari F; Moriconi E; Pronio AM; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):670-80. PubMed ID: 17446524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Breast disease: tissue characterization with Gd-DTPA enhancement profiles.
Stack JP; Redmond OM; Codd MB; Dervan PA; Ennis JT
Radiology; 1990 Feb; 174(2):491-4. PubMed ID: 2296657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of MRI features of different grades of DCIS and invasive carcinoma of the breast.
Van Goethem M; Schelfout K; Kersschot E; Colpaert C; Weyler J; Verslegers I; Biltjes I; De Schepper A; Parizel PM
JBR-BTR; 2005; 88(5):225-32. PubMed ID: 16302331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Diagnostic value of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast].
Winnekendonk G; Krug B; Warm M; Göhring UJ; Mallmann P; Lackner K
Rofo; 2004 May; 176(5):688-93. PubMed ID: 15122467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Do mammography, sonography, and MR mammography have a diagnostic benefit compared with mammography and sonography?
Müller-Schimpfle M; Stoll P; Stern W; Kurz S; Dammann F; Claussen CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1323-9. PubMed ID: 9129436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Three-phase dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging with two-way subtraction.
Choi N; Han BK; Choe YH; Kim HS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2005; 29(6):834-41. PubMed ID: 16272861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The variability of fibroadenoma in contrast-enhanced dynamic MR mammography.
Brinck U; Fischer U; Korabiowska M; Jutrowski M; Schauer A; Grabbe E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1331-4. PubMed ID: 9129437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Irradiation of the cervix uteri: value of unenhanced and contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Hricak H; Swift PS; Campos Z; Quivey JM; Gildengorin V; Göranson H
Radiology; 1993 Nov; 189(2):381-8. PubMed ID: 8210364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dynamic TurboFLASH subtraction technique for contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the prostate: correlation with histopathologic results.
Jager GJ; Ruijter ET; van de Kaa CA; de la Rosette JJ; Oosterhof GO; Thornbury JR; Ruijs SH; Barentsz JO
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):645-52. PubMed ID: 9169683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Is there a correlation in breast carcinomas between tumor size and number of tumor vessels detected by gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography?
Siewert C; Oellinger H; Sherif HK; Blohmer JU; Hadijuana J; Felix R
MAGMA; 1997 Mar; 5(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 9219176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of pectoralis major muscle in patients with posterior breast tumors on breast MR images: early experience.
Morris EA; Schwartz LH; Drotman MB; Kim SJ; Tan LK; Liberman L; Abramson AF; Van Zee KJ; Dershaw DD
Radiology; 2000 Jan; 214(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 10644103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Diagnostic performance characteristics of architectural features revealed by high spatial-resolution MR imaging of the breast.
Nunes LW; Schnall MD; Siegelman ES; Langlotz CP; Orel SG; Sullivan D; Muenz LA; Reynolds CA; Torosian MH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Aug; 169(2):409-15. PubMed ID: 9242744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dynamic breath-hold multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging with gadolinium enhancement for differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from malignancies at 1.5 T.
Whitney WS; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; McDonnell CH; Li KC; Van Dalsem WJ; Low RN; Francis IR; Dabatin JF; Glazer GM
Radiology; 1993 Dec; 189(3):863-70. PubMed ID: 8234717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI?
Zuiani C; Francescutti GE; Londero V; Zunnui I; Bazzocchi M
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 12585661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dynamic MR imaging of the breast combined with analysis of contrast agent kinetics in the differentiation of primary breast tumours.
Mussurakis S; Buckley DL; Drew PJ; Fox JN; Carleton PJ; Turnbull LW; Horsman A
Clin Radiol; 1997 Jul; 52(7):516-26. PubMed ID: 9240704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Role of breast MR imaging for predicting malignancy of histologically borderline lesions diagnosed at core needle biopsy: prospective evaluation.
Pediconi F; Padula S; Dominelli V; Luciani M; Telesca M; Casali V; Kirchin MA; Passariello R; Catalano C
Radiology; 2010 Dec; 257(3):653-61. PubMed ID: 20884914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [A pharmacokinetic analysis of Gd-DTPA enhancement in MRT in breast carcinoma].
Hess T; Knopp MV; Hoffmann U; Brix G; Junkermann H; Zuna I; von Fournier D; van Kaick G
Rofo; 1994 Jun; 160(6):518-23. PubMed ID: 8011997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
