242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7480899)
1. [Adverse reactions to contrast media for intravenous use. A comparison between ionic and nonionic media].
Urrutia M; Macharaviaya A; Rodríguez R
Rev Med Panama; 1995; 20(1-2):20-4. PubMed ID: 7480899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Frequency and effects of extravasation of ionic and nonionic CT contrast media during rapid bolus injection.
Federle MP; Chang PJ; Confer S; Ozgun B
Radiology; 1998 Mar; 206(3):637-40. PubMed ID: 9494479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ionic versus nonionic contrast media: a prospective study of the effect of rapid bolus injection on nausea and anaphylactoid reactions.
Federle MP; Willis LL; Swanson DP
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(3):341-5. PubMed ID: 9606371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Early hemodynamic reactions of an ionic low osmolar and a nonionic contrast medium].
Wink K; Heinrich R
Z Kardiol; 1984 Oct; 73(10):628-33. PubMed ID: 6516515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Adverse reactions to high osmolarity contrast media. A comparative-prospective study].
Urrutia M; Macharaviaya A; Rodríguez R
Rev Med Panama; 1994 Jan; 19(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 7938712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pain in peripheral arteriography-a comparison of a low osmolality contrast medium with a conventional compound.
Tillmann U; Adler R; Fuchs WA
Br J Radiol; 1979 Feb; 52(614):102-4. PubMed ID: 371733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanisms of blood pressure change after bolus injections of X-ray contrast media.
Lasser EC; Lamkin GE
Acad Radiol; 2002 May; 9 Suppl 1():S72-5. PubMed ID: 12019900
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Renal effects of nonionic contrast media after intravenous cardiac, and lumbar aortic injections.
Jakobsen JA; Kolbenstvedt AN; Levorstad K; Berg KJ; Enge I
Invest Radiol; 1990 Sep; 25 Suppl 1():S135-6. PubMed ID: 2283233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Acute severe thrombocytopenia following non-ionic low-osmolarity intravenous contrast medium injection.
Bata P; Tarnoki AD; Tarnoki DL; Horvath E; Berczi V; Szalay F
Korean J Radiol; 2012; 13(4):505-9. PubMed ID: 22778575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of severe adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media in Japan: evaluation of pretesting. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media.
Yamaguchi K; Katayama H; Takashima T; Kozuka T; Seez P; Matsuura K
Radiology; 1991 Feb; 178(2):363-7. PubMed ID: 1987594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Delayed adverse reaction to nonionic contrast agents.
Newman B
Pediatr Radiol; 2001 Aug; 31(8):597-9. PubMed ID: 11550775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reports on contrast media reactions: analysis of data from reports to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Lasser EC; Lyon SG; Berry CC
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):605-10. PubMed ID: 9169676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pharmacokinetics of contrast media: experimental results in dog and man with CT implications.
Gardeur D; Lautrou J; Millard JC; Berger N; Metzger J
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1980 Apr; 4(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 7365016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis as a delayed dermatotoxic reaction to IV-administered nonionic contrast media.
Peterson A; Katzberg RW; Fung MA; Wootton-Gorges SL; Dager W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Aug; 187(2):W198-201. PubMed ID: 16861512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Iohexol in patients with previous adverse reactions to contrast media.
Holtås S
Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6):563-5. PubMed ID: 6511264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Experimental and clinical determination of renal size after intravenous and intra-arterial administration of ionic and non-ionic contrast media].
Helzel MV; Wolf GK; Prager P
Rofo; 1985 Mar; 142(3):333-7. PubMed ID: 2984739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast agent-induced thrombophlebitis following leg phlebography: meglumine loxaglate versus meglumine lothalamate.
Thomas ML; Briggs GM; Kuan BB
Radiology; 1983 May; 147(2):399-400. PubMed ID: 6340158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contrast agent-induced thrombophlebitis following leg phlebography: lohexol compared with meglumine iothalamate.
Thomas ML; Bowles JN; Piaggio RB; Price J; Treweeke PS
Vasa; 1985; 14(1):81-3. PubMed ID: 3883671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Adverse reactions following high-dose intravenous injection of urographic contrast media].
Lackner K; Köster O; von Uexküll V; Broich H
Rofo; 1984 Oct; 141(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 6436920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contrast media in double-contrast arthrography of the knee: a comparison of ioxaglate and iothalamate preparations.
Ingram C; Stoker DJ
Br J Radiol; 1986 Feb; 59(698):143-6. PubMed ID: 3512006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
