These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7481980)

  • 1. Discovery method and stage of breast cancer in two different patient populations.
    Tigges S; Monticciolo DL; Kessler L
    South Med J; 1995 Nov; 88(11):1114-7. PubMed ID: 7481980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Europe against Cancer breast cancer screening programme in France: the ADEMAS programme in Bas-Rhin.
    Renaud R; Gairard B; Schaffer P; Guldenfels C; Haehnel P; Dale G; Bellocq JP
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 1994 Jan; 3 Suppl 1():13-9. PubMed ID: 8130721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast cancer screening in southern Greece.
    Garas I; Pateras H; Triandafilou D; Georgountzos V; Mihas A; Abatzoglou M; Trichopoulos D
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 1994 Jan; 3 Suppl 1():35-9. PubMed ID: 8130725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spectrum of mammographically detected breast cancers.
    Sener SF; Winchester DJ; Winchester DP; Kurek R; Motykie G; Martz CH; Rabbitt S
    Am Surg; 1999 Aug; 65(8):731-5; discussion 735-6. PubMed ID: 10432082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bilateral breast cancer: early detection with mammography.
    Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Lai NE; Paramagul C
    Radiology; 1995 Aug; 196(2):427-31. PubMed ID: 7617856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer.
    White E; Miglioretti DL; Yankaskas BC; Geller BM; Rosenberg RD; Kerlikowske K; Saba L; Vacek PM; Carney PA; Buist DS; Oestreicher N; Barlow W; Ballard-Barbash R; Taplin SH
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(24):1832-9. PubMed ID: 15601639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increases in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast in relation to mammography: a dilemma.
    Ernster VL; Barclay J
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1997; (22):151-6. PubMed ID: 9709292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Loring L; Dershaw DD
    Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1997 Dec; 38(6):501-33. PubMed ID: 9442977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Screening mammography in women 40-49 years old.
    Cardenosa G; Eklund GW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1104-6. PubMed ID: 7717213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk.
    Kerlikowske K; Ichikawa L; Miglioretti DL; Buist DS; Vacek PM; Smith-Bindman R; Yankaskas B; Carney PA; Ballard-Barbash R;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Mar; 99(5):386-95. PubMed ID: 17341730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Method of tumor detection influences disease-free survival of women with breast carcinoma.
    Senie RT; Lesser M; Kinne DW; Rosen PP
    Cancer; 1994 Mar; 73(6):1666-72. PubMed ID: 8156494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparative analysis of early diagnostic tools for breast cancer].
    Shen SJ; Sun Q; Xu YL; Zhou YD; Guan JH; Mao F; Lin Y; Wang XJ; Han SM
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 34(11):877-80. PubMed ID: 23291142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognosis for mammographically occult, early-stage breast cancer patients treated with breast-conservation therapy.
    Yang TJ; Yang Q; Haffty BG; Moran MS
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Jan; 76(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 19619957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screening ultrasonography revealed 15% of mammographically occult breast cancers.
    Uchida K; Yamashita A; Kawase K; Kamiya K
    Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 18224382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Early results of breast cancer screening research].
    Nowicki A; Stogowska I
    Ginekol Pol; 2007 Jun; 78(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 17899703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The comparative value of mammographic screening for women 40-49 years old versus women 50-64 years old.
    Curpen BN; Sickles EA; Sollitto RA; Ominsky SH; Galvin HB; Frankel SD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1099-103. PubMed ID: 7717212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast cancer screening in the central region of Portugal.
    Alves JG; Cruz DB; Rodrigues VL; Gonçalves ML; Fernandes E
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 1994 Jan; 3 Suppl 1():49-53. PubMed ID: 8130727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast MRI: opportunities and challenges.
    Day D
    Minn Med; 2009 Dec; 92(12):45-8. PubMed ID: 20092173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of age, breast density and volume on breast cancer diagnosis: a retrospective comparison of sensitivity of mammography and ultrasonography in China's rural areas.
    Wang FL; Chen F; Yin H; Xu N; Wu XX; Ma JJ; Gao S; Tang JH; Lu C
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(4):2277-82. PubMed ID: 23725127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in incidence of in situ and invasive breast cancer by histology type following mammography screening.
    Luke C; Priest K; Roder D
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2006; 7(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 16629519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.