These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7482154)

  • 1. The upper end of the femur: dimensions of the endosteal canal.
    Fessy MH; Bejui J; Fischer LP; Bouchet A
    Surg Radiol Anat; 1995; 17(2):155-60, 21-3. PubMed ID: 7482154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The morphology of the proximal femur. A three-dimensional radiographic analysis.
    Rubin PJ; Leyvraz PF; Aubaniac JM; Argenson JN; Estève P; de Roguin B
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1992 Jan; 74(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 1732260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Determination of the antetorsional angle at the femur with axial computer tomography].
    Grote R; Elgeti H; Saure D
    Rontgenblatter; 1980 Jan; 33(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 7355256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Cementless hip prosthesis design: a basic study and analysis of the proximal femur in normal Japanese people].
    Fuku H
    Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Sep; 68(9):763-73. PubMed ID: 7963930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Femoral version and neck shaft angle.
    Miller F; Merlo M; Liang Y; Kupcha P; Jamison J; Harcke HT
    J Pediatr Orthop; 1993; 13(3):382-8. PubMed ID: 8496377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Image processing for femoral endosteal anatomy detection: description and testing of a computed tomography based program.
    Laine HJ; Kontola K; Lehto MU; Pitkänen M; Jarske P; Lindholm TS
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Apr; 42(4):673-89. PubMed ID: 9127444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diversity of proximal femoral medullary canal.
    Laine HJ; Lehto MU; Moilanen T
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jan; 15(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 10654468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surgically Relevant Morphological Parameters of Proximal Human Femur: A Statistical Analysis Based on 3D Reconstruction of CT Data.
    Soodmand E; Zheng G; Steens W; Bader R; Nolte L; Kluess D
    Orthop Surg; 2019 Feb; 11(1):135-142. PubMed ID: 30809957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A semi-automated method for measuring femoral shape to derive version and its comparison with existing methods.
    Berryman F; Pynsent P; McBryde C
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2014 Nov; 30(11):1314-25. PubMed ID: 25044860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Morphological study of the newly designed cementless femoral stem.
    Baharuddin MY; Salleh ShH; Zulkifly AH; Lee MH; Mohd Noor A
    Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():692328. PubMed ID: 25025068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Femoral anteversion.
    Murphy SB; Simon SR; Kijewski PK; Wilkinson RH; Griscom NT
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1987 Oct; 69(8):1169-76. PubMed ID: 3667647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The reconstruction of three-dimension morphology of proximal femur].
    Wang W; Wang Y; Cui J; Han G
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Oct; 41(10):744-8. PubMed ID: 14766046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of aging on the shape of the proximal femur.
    Noble PC; Box GG; Kamaric E; Fink MJ; Alexander JW; Tullos HS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Jul; (316):31-44. PubMed ID: 7634721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Basic concepts of femoral neck anteversion: comparison of two definitions.
    Høiseth A; Reikerås O; Fønstelien E
    Br J Radiol; 1989 Feb; 62(734):114-6. PubMed ID: 2924092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the Dunlap/Rippstein method for determination of femoral neck angles.
    Reikerås O; Høiseth A; Reigstad A
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1985; 26(2):177-9. PubMed ID: 3993421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relationship of neck orientation to the shape of the proximal femur.
    Clark JM; Freeman MA; Witham D
    J Arthroplasty; 1987; 2(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 3612146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated method for computing the morphological and clinical parameters of the proximal femur using heuristic modeling techniques.
    Cerveri P; Marchente M; Bartels W; Corten K; Simon JP; Manzotti A
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 May; 38(5):1752-66. PubMed ID: 20177779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The cam impinging femur has multiple morphologic abnormalities.
    Ellis AR; Noble PC; Schroder SJ; Thompson MT; Stocks GW
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Sep; 26(6 Suppl):59-65. PubMed ID: 21839875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty.
    Lecerf G; Fessy MH; Philippot R; Massin P; Giraud F; Flecher X; Girard J; Mertl P; Marchetti E; Stindel E
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 May; 95(3):210-9. PubMed ID: 19423418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Femoral anatomy described in cylindrical coordinates using computed tomography.
    Egund N; Palmer J
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1984; 25(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 6475558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.