166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 748254)
1. The application of the dose-equivalent index to the natural radiation background.
O'Brien K
Health Phys; 1978 Sep; 35(3):506-8. PubMed ID: 748254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. RBE and wR values of sparsely ionising radiations.
Chadwwick KH; leenhouts HP
J Radiol Prot; 2007 Dec; 27(4):503-4. PubMed ID: 18273998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Dose equivalent unit.
Loevinger R
Health Phys; 1979 Oct; 37(4):602-3. PubMed ID: 536225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The annual effective dose from natural sources of ionising radiation in Canada.
Grasty RL; LaMarre JR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 108(3):215-26. PubMed ID: 15031443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Characteristics of the hygienic evaluation of the natural source of radiation].
Karpov VI; Kudritskiĭ IuK
Gig Sanit; 1987 Jun; (6):59-61. PubMed ID: 3623119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Differential absorbed dose distributions in lineal energy for neutrons and gamma rays at the mono-energetic neutron calibration facility.
Takada M; Baba M; Yamaguchi H; Fujitaka K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(4):481-90. PubMed ID: 15914511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Background radiation and estimated risks from low-dose irradiation.
Spiers FW
Health Phys; 1979 Dec; 37(6):784-9. PubMed ID: 544568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Why it is advisable to keep wR = 1 and Q = 1 for photons and electrons.
Dietze G; Alberts WG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 109(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 15273347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Natural background radiation: problem of radionuclide migration and biological effects].
Aleksakhin RM; Knizhnikov VA; Taskaev AI
Radiobiologiia; 1986; 26(3):292-301. PubMed ID: 3526391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radioactivity concentrations and dose assessment for soil samples from Kestanbol granite area, Turkey.
Merdanoğlu B; Altinsoy N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 16698965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Review of relative biological effectiveness dependence on linear energy transfer for low-LET radiations.
Hunter N; Muirhead CR
J Radiol Prot; 2009 Mar; 29(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 19225189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Ionizing radiation: dangers and protective measures].
Harlay A
Infirm Fr; 1980 Dec; (220):29-32. PubMed ID: 6907175
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Natural radioactivity in some building materials in Cuba and their contribution to the indoor gamma dose rate.
Flores OB; Estrada AM; Zerquera JT
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(2):218-22. PubMed ID: 15572398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two principal considerations are needed after low doses of ionizing radiation.
Feinendegen LE; Paretzke H; Neumann RD
Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):247-8. PubMed ID: 18220467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Secular change of background activity in Ge(Li) detector (author's transl)].
Sakurai J; Komura K
Radioisotopes; 1981 Aug; 30(8):471-4. PubMed ID: 7335922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Principles for limiting exposure of the public to natural sources of radiation.
Ann ICRP; 1984; 14(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 6426357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Radioactivity concentrations in soils of the Xiazhuang granite area, China.
Yang YX; Wu XM; Jiang ZY; Wang WX; Lu JG; Lin J; Wang LM; Hsia YF
Appl Radiat Isot; 2005 Aug; 63(2):255-9. PubMed ID: 15922605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Natural radiation doses for cosmic and terrestrial components in Costa Rica.
Mora P; Picado E; Minato S
Appl Radiat Isot; 2007 Jan; 65(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 16905324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Current status of the problem of radiation protection in space flight].
Kovalev EE
Kosm Biol Aviakosm Med; 1984; 18(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 6321853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An approach to setting radiation standards.
Adler HI; Weinberg AM
Health Phys; 1978 Jun; 34(6):719-20. PubMed ID: 730528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
