These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7484968)

  • 1. Changes in facial dimensions assessed from lateral and frontal photographs. Part II--Results and conclusions.
    Bishara SE; Jorgensen GJ; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Nov; 108(5):489-99. PubMed ID: 7484968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in facial dimensions assessed from lateral and frontal photographs. Part I--Methodology.
    Bishara SE; Jorgensen GJ; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Oct; 108(4):389-93. PubMed ID: 7572850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Divine proportions in the growing face.
    Ferring V; Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):472-9. PubMed ID: 18929263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic value of profile photography in identifying departures from the norm of growth pattern and horizontal jaw relationship.
    Sajjadi SH; Elmi B; Hajizade N; Rakhshan V
    Int Orthod; 2017 Sep; 15(3):322-331. PubMed ID: 28778724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cross-sectional human mandibular morphology as assessed in vivo by cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different vertical facial dimensions.
    Swasty D; Lee J; Huang JC; Maki K; Gansky SA; Hatcher D; Miller AJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4 Suppl):e377-89. PubMed ID: 21435546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment.
    Shell TL; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 16429875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity and reliability of facial profile evaluation in vertical and horizontal dimensions from lateral cephalograms and lateral photographs.
    Michiels G; Sather AH
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 8006483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The measurement of anterior and posterior facial heights in a Nigerian population.
    Isiekwe M
    Afr Dent J; 1994; 8():1-6. PubMed ID: 9590879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Masseter muscle thickness in growing individuals and its relation to facial morphology.
    Raadsheer MC; Kiliaridis S; Van Eijden TM; Van Ginkel FC; Prahl-Andersen B
    Arch Oral Biol; 1996 Apr; 41(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 8771323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Facial analysis without cephalometric radiography].
    Remmelink HJ; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2000 Apr; 107(4):141-4. PubMed ID: 11382969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dental maturity amongst various vertical and sagittal facial patterns.
    Sukhia RH; Fida M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2010 Apr; 20(4):225-8. PubMed ID: 20392395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of various facial and occlusal characteristics in mature individuals, with vertical and horizontal growth direction expressed at the chin.
    Lundström A; Woodside DG
    Eur J Orthod; 1981; 3(4):227-35. PubMed ID: 6945992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Age- and sex-specific analysis of the dentomaxillofacial measures in children with normal and abnormal dental findings. 7. Morphological facial height and lower facial height].
    Graf H; Koch EM; Zellner K; Jaeger U
    Stomatol DDR; 1982 Feb; 32(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 6956034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Applicability of a pre-established set of facial proportions from frontal photographs in forensic age estimation of a Brazilian population.
    Machado CEP; Santiago BM; Lima LNC; Gonzales PS; Franco A; Vidal FB; Aguilera IA; Guimarães MA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Aug; 301():e1-e7. PubMed ID: 31176532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vertical dimension of the face analyzed by digital photographs.
    Gomes VL; Gonçalves LC; Correia CL; Lucas BL; Carvalho PM
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2008; 3(4):362-70. PubMed ID: 19655547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Longitudinal changes in facial type in cases with vertical and horizontal mandibular growth directions.
    Lundström A; Woodside DG
    Eur J Orthod; 1983 Nov; 5(4):259-68. PubMed ID: 6581048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An orthodontic view of dentofacial esthetics.
    Morris W
    Compendium; 1994 Mar; 15(3):378, 380-2, 384 passim; quiz 390. PubMed ID: 8205591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Lower anterior facial height and its implications for occlusion].
    Karamalikis DD
    Odontostomatol Proodos; 1987 Oct; 41(5):317-21. PubMed ID: 3143978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preadenoid space size and its relationship to the vertical facial type.
    Gomez CE; Gomez LC; Chacon JA
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 16548308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Photographic analysis of the facial profile in a Spanish population: a study of 501 school children 4-15 years old].
    Baca Garcia A; Carreño Garcia J
    Orthod Fr; 1989; 60 Pt 2():849-50. PubMed ID: 2490261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.