These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7485071)

  • 1. Alternative approaches for estimating prevalence in epidemiologic surveys with two waves of respondents.
    Brenner H
    Am J Epidemiol; 1995 Dec; 142(11):1236-45. PubMed ID: 7485071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of nonresponse on prevalence estimates for a referent population: insights from a population-based cohort study. Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Investigators.
    Shahar E; Folsom AR; Jackson R
    Ann Epidemiol; 1996 Nov; 6(6):498-506. PubMed ID: 8978880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A confidence interval approach to investigating non-response bias and monitoring response to postal questionnaires.
    Tennant A; Badley EM
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1991 Mar; 45(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 1828494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Studies with low response proportions may be less biased than studies with high response proportions.
    Stang A; Jöckel KH
    Am J Epidemiol; 2004 Jan; 159(2):204-10. PubMed ID: 14718223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Grouping methods for estimating the prevalences of rare traits from complex survey data that preserve confidentiality of respondents.
    Hyun N; Gastwirth JL; Graubard BI
    Stat Med; 2018 Jun; 37(13):2174-2186. PubMed ID: 29579785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selective attrition and bias in a longitudinal health survey among survivors of a disaster.
    van den Berg B; van der Velden P; Stellato R; Grievink L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Feb; 7():8. PubMed ID: 17302968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating maternal mortality in Djibouti: an application of the sisterhood method.
    David P; Kawar S; Graham W
    Int J Epidemiol; 1991 Jun; 20(2):551-7. PubMed ID: 1917264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The value of capture-recapture methods even for apparent exhaustive surveys. The need for adjustment for source of ascertainment intersection in attempted complete prevalence studies.
    Hook EB; Regal RR
    Am J Epidemiol; 1992 May; 135(9):1060-7. PubMed ID: 1534441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Difficult-to-recruit respondents and their effect on prevalence estimates in an epidemiologic survey.
    Cottler LB; Zipp JF; Robins LN; Spitznagel EL
    Am J Epidemiol; 1987 Feb; 125(2):329-39. PubMed ID: 3812439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigating non-response bias in a survey of disablement in the community: implications for survey methodology.
    Tennant A; Badley EM
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1991 Sep; 45(3):247-50. PubMed ID: 1836811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Alternative Approaches to Assessing Nonresponse Bias in Longitudinal Survey Estimates: An Application to Substance-Use Outcomes Among Young Adults in the United States.
    West BT; McCabe SE
    Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 185(7):591-600. PubMed ID: 28338839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Paper- or Web-Based Questionnaire Invitations as a Method for Data Collection: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study of Differences in Response Rate, Completeness of Data, and Financial Cost.
    Ebert JF; Huibers L; Christensen B; Christensen MB
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Jan; 20(1):e24. PubMed ID: 29362206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Following up nonrespondents to an online weight management intervention: randomized trial comparing mail versus telephone.
    Couper MP; Peytchev A; Strecher VJ; Rothert K; Anderson J
    J Med Internet Res; 2007 Jun; 9(2):e16. PubMed ID: 17567564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimates of contraceptive prevalence based on service statistics and surveys in Gujarat State, India.
    Visaria L; Visaria P; Jain A
    Stud Fam Plann; 1994; 25(5):293-303. PubMed ID: 7871554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Non-response bias in a community survey of drinking, alcohol-related experiences and public opinion on alcohol policy.
    Maclennan B; Kypri K; Langley J; Room R
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2012 Nov; 126(1-2):189-94. PubMed ID: 22677457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of the positive predictive value to correct for disease misclassification in epidemiologic studies.
    Brenner H; Gefeller O
    Am J Epidemiol; 1993 Dec; 138(11):1007-15. PubMed ID: 8256775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating telephone follow-up of a mail survey of community pharmacies.
    Westrick SC; Mount JK
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Jun; 3(2):160-82. PubMed ID: 17561218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of Response Bias Is Neglected in Cross-Sectional Blindness Prevalence Surveys: A Review of Recent Surveys in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.
    Ramke J; Palagyi A; Kuper H; Gilbert CE
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2018; 25(5-6):379-385. PubMed ID: 30059647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A protocol to identify and minimise selection and information bias in abattoir surveys estimating prevalence, using Fasciola hepatica as an example.
    Carroll RI; Forbes A; Graham DA; Messam LLM
    Prev Vet Med; 2017 Sep; 144():57-65. PubMed ID: 28716204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.