These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7485174)

  • 1. Efficiency of typing unaffected relatives in an affected-sib-pair linkage study with single-locus and multiple tightly linked markers.
    Holmans P; Clayton D
    Am J Hum Genet; 1995 Nov; 57(5):1221-32. PubMed ID: 7485174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Association tests in nuclear families.
    Siegmund KD; Gauderman WJ
    Hum Hered; 2001; 52(2):66-76. PubMed ID: 11474207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-locus models of disease: comparison of likelihood and nonparametric linkage methods.
    Goldin LR; Weeks DE
    Am J Hum Genet; 1993 Oct; 53(4):908-15. PubMed ID: 8213819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Likelihood-based inference for the genetic relative risk based on affected-sibling-pair marker data.
    McKnight B; Tierney C; McGorray SP; Day NE
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):426-43. PubMed ID: 9629637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linkage detection adaptive to linkage disequilibrium: the disequilibrium maximum-likelihood-binomial test for affected-sibship data.
    Huang J; Jiang Y
    Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Dec; 65(6):1741-59. PubMed ID: 10577929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of stratification in the analysis of affected-sib-pair data: benefits and costs.
    Leal SM; Ott J
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Feb; 66(2):567-75. PubMed ID: 10677317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Asymptotic properties of affected-sib-pair linkage analysis.
    Holmans P
    Am J Hum Genet; 1993 Feb; 52(2):362-74. PubMed ID: 8430697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. II. The power of affected relative pairs.
    Risch N
    Am J Hum Genet; 1990 Feb; 46(2):229-41. PubMed ID: 2301393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Likelihood-ratio affected sib-pair tests applied to multiply affected sibships: issues of power and type I error rate.
    Holmans P
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Jan; 20(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 11119296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Design considerations in a sib-pair study of linkage for susceptibility loci in cancer.
    Kerber RA; Amos CI; Yeap BY; Finkelstein DM; Thomas DC
    BMC Med Genet; 2008 Jul; 9():64. PubMed ID: 18616822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Power of sib-pair and sib-trio linkage analysis with assortative mating and multiple disease loci.
    Sribney WM; Swift M
    Am J Hum Genet; 1992 Oct; 51(4):773-84. PubMed ID: 1415221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Power of affected sibling method tests for linkage.
    Tierney C; McKnight B
    Hum Hered; 1993; 43(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 8406516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of disease genes by use of family data. I. Likelihood-based theory.
    Whittemore AS; Tu IP
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1328-40. PubMed ID: 10739758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ignoring linkage disequilibrium among tightly linked markers induces false-positive evidence of linkage for affected sib pair analysis.
    Huang Q; Shete S; Amos CI
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Dec; 75(6):1106-12. PubMed ID: 15492927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multilocus linkage tests based on affected relative pairs.
    Cordell HJ; Wedig GC; Jacobs KB; Elston RC
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1273-86. PubMed ID: 10729111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association tests using unaffected-sibling versus pseudo-sibling controls.
    Siegmund KD; Gauderman WJ; Thomas DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S731-6. PubMed ID: 10597522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci.
    Blackwelder WC; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1985; 2(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 3863778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Linkage analysis in the presence of errors III: marker loci and their map as nuisance parameters.
    Göring HH; Terwilliger JD
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Apr; 66(4):1298-309. PubMed ID: 10731467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Affected-sib-pair test for linkage based on constraints for identical-by-descent distributions corresponding to disease models with imprinting.
    Knapp M; Strauch K
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 May; 26(4):273-85. PubMed ID: 15095387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal weighting scheme for affected sib-pair analysis of sibship data.
    Sham PC; Zhao JH; Curtis D
    Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jan; 61(Pt 1):61-9. PubMed ID: 9066928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.