203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7485307)
1. Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel (Prepidil gel): randomized comparison.
Chuck FJ; Huffaker BJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Oct; 173(4):1137-42. PubMed ID: 7485307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for ripening of unfavorable cervix and labor induction.
Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Pokpirom J
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1997 Aug; 23(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9311179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Rahall A; Jones MM; Goodwin TM; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1811-6. PubMed ID: 7778637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Misoprostol is more efficacious for labor induction than prostaglandin E2, but is it associated with more risk?
Kolderup L; McLean L; Grullon K; Safford K; Kilpatrick SJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jun; 180(6 Pt 1):1543-50. PubMed ID: 10368502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Local administration of prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and labor induction: the appropriate route and dose.
Nuutila M; Kajanoja P
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1996 Feb; 75(2):135-8. PubMed ID: 8604599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Neiger R; Greaves PC
Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intracervical misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 for labor induction.
Chang YK; Chen WH; Yu MH; Liu HS
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Jan; 80(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 12527456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a more effective agent than prostaglandin F2 alpha gel and prostaglandin E2 pessary.
Majoko F; Zwizwai M; Nyström L; Lindmark G
Cent Afr J Med; 2002; 48(11-12):123-8. PubMed ID: 14562597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Jones MM; Rahall A; Goodwin TM; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1804-10. PubMed ID: 7778636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative efficacy and cost of the prostaglandin analogs dinoprostone and misoprostol as labor preinduction agents.
Ramsey PS; Harris DY; Ogburn PL; Heise RH; Magtibay PM; Ramin KD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Feb; 188(2):560-5. PubMed ID: 12592272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized trial of two doses of the prostaglandin E1 analog misoprostol for labor induction.
Farah LA; Sanchez-Ramos L; Rosa C; Del Valle GO; Gaudier FL; Delke I; Kaunitz AM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 177(2):364-9; discussion 369-71. PubMed ID: 9290452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labor at term.
Varaklis K; Gumina R; Stubblefield PG
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Oct; 86(4 Pt 1):541-4. PubMed ID: 7675376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized prospective comparison of the efficacy and safety of intravaginal and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel.
Stempel JE; Prins RP; Dean S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 176(6):1305-9; discussion 1309-12. PubMed ID: 9215189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Induction of labor with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone.
Ozgür K; Kizilates A; Uner M; Erman O; Trak B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1997; 261(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 9451517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Chang CH; Chang FM
J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pre-eclampsia and induction of labor: a randomized comparison of prostaglandin E2 as an intracervical gel, with oxytocin immediately, or as a sustained-release vaginal insert.
Hennessey MH; Rayburn WF; Stewart JD; Liles EC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Nov; 179(5):1204-9. PubMed ID: 9822501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial.
Chaudhuri S; Mitra SN; Banerjee PK; Biswas PK; Bhattacharyya S
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1564-71. PubMed ID: 21676083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Oral misoprostol and intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized comparison.
Bartha JL; Comino-Delgado R; Garcia-Benasach F; Martinez-Del-Fresno P; Moreno-Corral LJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Sep; 96(3):465-9. PubMed ID: 10960643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Ortiz-Omphroy G; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 9322632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
