These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7485585)

  • 1. Scatter in input impedance spectrum may result from the elastic nonlinearity of the arterial wall.
    Stergiopulos N; Meister JJ; Westerhof N
    Am J Physiol; 1995 Oct; 269(4 Pt 2):H1490-5. PubMed ID: 7485585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simple and accurate way for estimating total and segmental arterial compliance: the pulse pressure method.
    Stergiopulos N; Meister JJ; Westerhof N
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1994; 22(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 7998684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hydraulic input impedance measurements in physical models of the arterial wall.
    Papageorgiou GL; Jones NB
    J Biomed Eng; 1989 Nov; 11(6):471-7. PubMed ID: 2811346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simulation of arterial hemodynamics after partial prosthetic replacement of the aorta.
    Bauernschmitt R; Schulz S; Schwarzhaupt A; Kiencke U; Vahl CF; Lange R; Hagl S
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1999 Mar; 67(3):676-82. PubMed ID: 10215210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Total systemic arterial compliance and aortic characteristic impedance in the dog as a function of pressure: a model based study.
    Burattini R; Gnudi G; Westerhof N; Fioretti S
    Comput Biomed Res; 1987 Apr; 20(2):154-65. PubMed ID: 3595097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study of viscoelastic arterial wall models in nonlinear one-dimensional finite element simulations of blood flow.
    Raghu R; Vignon-Clementel IE; Figueroa CA; Taylor CA
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Aug; 133(8):081003. PubMed ID: 21950896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of methods for estimation of total arterial compliance.
    Stergiopulos N; Meister JJ; Westerhof N
    Am J Physiol; 1995 Apr; 268(4 Pt 2):H1540-8. PubMed ID: 7733355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hydrodynamic model of blood flow in major arteries pulsing in various modes.
    Belousov YM; Krainov VP; Revenko SV
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2021 Sep; 59(9):1785-1794. PubMed ID: 34302595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Functional origin of reflected pressure waves in a multibranched model of the human arterial system.
    Karamanoglu M; Gallagher DE; Avolio AP; O'Rourke MF
    Am J Physiol; 1994 Nov; 267(5 Pt 2):H1681-8. PubMed ID: 7977799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simulation environment for validating ultrasonic blood flow and vessel wall imaging based on fluid-structure interaction simulations: ultrasonic assessment of arterial distension and wall shear rate.
    Swillens A; Degroote J; Vierendeels J; Lovstakken L; Segers P
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4318-30. PubMed ID: 20879592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of Windkessel as a model of aortic input impedance.
    Burkhoff D; Alexander J; Schipke J
    Am J Physiol; 1988 Oct; 255(4 Pt 2):H742-53. PubMed ID: 3177666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Instantaneous blood flow, impedance and elastic properties computed in man from aortic pulse waves.
    Tedgui AS; Levy BI; Sebag SR
    J Theor Biol; 1983 Apr; 101(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 6887946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Manipulation of ascending aortic pressure and flow wave reflections with the Valsalva maneuver: relationship to input impedance.
    Murgo JP; Westerhof N; Giolma JP; Altobelli SA
    Circulation; 1981 Jan; 63(1):122-32. PubMed ID: 7438386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Arterial functions: how to interpret the complex physiology.
    London GM; Pannier B
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2010 Dec; 25(12):3815-23. PubMed ID: 20947536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement of aortic input impedance in rats.
    Mitchell GF; Pfeffer MA; Westerhof N; Pfeffer JM
    Am J Physiol; 1994 Nov; 267(5 Pt 2):H1907-15. PubMed ID: 7977821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of 1D blood flow models of the human arterial network to differential pressure predictions.
    Johnson DA; Rose WC; Edwards JW; Naik UP; Beris AN
    J Biomech; 2011 Mar; 44(5):869-76. PubMed ID: 21236432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vascular load defined by the aortic input impedance spectrum.
    Nichols WW; Pepine CJ; Geiser EA; Conti CR
    Fed Proc; 1980 Feb; 39(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 7353677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noninvasive (input) impedance, pulse wave velocity, and wave reflection in healthy middle-aged men and women.
    Segers P; Rietzschel ER; De Buyzere ML; Vermeersch SJ; De Bacquer D; Van Bortel LM; De Backer G; Gillebert TC; Verdonck PR;
    Hypertension; 2007 Jun; 49(6):1248-55. PubMed ID: 17404183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analog transmission line model for simulation of systemic circulation.
    Chen CW; Shau YW; Wu CP
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1997 Jan; 44(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 9214787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of changes in the physical properties of the central elastic artery on haemodynamic characteristics during ageing.
    Shin SH; Park YB
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Jul; 223(5):525-35. PubMed ID: 19623906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.