These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7485767)

  • 1. [The ultrasonic assessment of the cicatrix after a past cesarean section].
    Popov I
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1994; 33(2):10-2. PubMed ID: 7485767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Echographic and morphological parallels in the evaluation of the condition of the uterine scar].
    Lebedev VA; Strizhakov AN; Zheleznov BI
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1991 Aug; (8):44-9. PubMed ID: 1755492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Second-trimester sonographic comparison of the lower uterine segment in pregnant women with and without a previous cesarean delivery.
    Sambaziotis H; Conway C; Figueroa R; Elimian A; Garry D
    J Ultrasound Med; 2004 Jul; 23(7):907-11; quiz 913-4. PubMed ID: 15292558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment at term in women with previous cesarean delivery.
    Kushtagi P; Garepalli S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Mar; 283(3):455-9. PubMed ID: 20145938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Use of echography in the management of labor in women with uterine scar after cesarean section].
    Belousov MA; Mareeva LS; Mel'nikov AP
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1991 Aug; (8):49-50. PubMed ID: 1755493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The problems and outlook for delivery in pregnant women with uterine scars following cesarean section].
    Mareeva LS; Levashova II; Mel'nikov AP; Zaĭtseva ZS; Belousov MA; Oberg OK
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1993; (1):22-7. PubMed ID: 8317621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Detection of uterine scar defect during pregnancy by ultrasonics].
    Yang TZ; Li WZ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1994 Aug; 29(8):458-60, 508-9. PubMed ID: 7835114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Standardized ultrasonographic approach for the assessment of risk factors of incomplete healing of the cesarean section scar in the uterus.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():141-5. PubMed ID: 27591715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Complication of cesarean section: pregnancy on the cicatrix of a previous cesarean section.
    Wang W; Long W; Yu Q
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2002 Feb; 115(2):242-6. PubMed ID: 11940341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment thickness in women with a single previous Cesarean section.
    Sanlorenzo O; Farina A; Pula G; Zanello M; Pedrazzi A; Martina T; Gabrielli S; Simonazzi G; Rizzo N
    Minerva Ginecol; 2013 Oct; 65(5):551-5. PubMed ID: 24096291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sonographic assessment of the lower uterine segment during active labor in women with or without a uterine scar - a prospective study.
    Barzilay E; Shay A; Lahav-Ezra H; Shina A; Perlman S; Achiron R; Gilboa Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Jul; 31(14):1885-1888. PubMed ID: 28511577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrasound evaluation of uterine scar after Cesarean section and next birth.
    Basic E; Basic-Cetkovic V; Kozaric H; Rama A
    Med Arch; 2012; 66(3 Suppl 1):41-4. PubMed ID: 22937691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Ultrasonography of the uterus cicatrix during the third pregnancy trimester after a Cesarean section].
    Amaliev G; Uchikova E; Parahuleva N; Amaliev I
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2014; 53 Suppl 1():4-7. PubMed ID: 25510033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Ultrasonographic analysis of cesarean scars features in nonpregnant uterus].
    Zimmer M; Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Tomiałowicz M; Michniewicz J; Wiatrowski A; Mikołajczyk K
    Ginekol Pol; 2007 Nov; 78(11):842-6. PubMed ID: 18306913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the lower uterine segment in pregnant women with and without previous cesarean section in 3 T MRI.
    Hoffmann J; Exner M; Bremicker K; Grothoff M; Stumpp P; Stepan H
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 May; 19(1):160. PubMed ID: 31068180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlations between sonographically measured and actual incision site thickness of lower uterine segment after repeated caesarean section.
    Indraccolo U; Scutiero G; Matteo M; Mastricci AL; Barone I; Greco P
    Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Jun; 67(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 25909490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evaluation of the condition of the uterine scar after cesarean section by echography].
    Titchenko LI; Belousov MA; Zhilenko MI
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1990 Nov; (11):69-70. PubMed ID: 2077921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sonographic assessment of post-cesarean section uterine scar in pregnant women.
    Markovitch O; Tepper R; Hershkovitz R
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Jan; 26(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 22928532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial of one- and two-layer closure.
    Hamar BD; Saber SB; Cackovic M; Magloire LK; Pettker CM; Abdel-Razeq SS; Rosenberg VA; Buhimschi IA; Buhimschi CS
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 110(4):808-13. PubMed ID: 17906013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of scar thickness measurements using trans-vaginal sonography and MRI in cases of pregnancy with previous caesarean section. Do they correlate with actual scar thickness?
    Singh N; Tripathi R; Mala YM; Dixit R; Tyagi S; Batra A
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Nov; 33(8):810-3. PubMed ID: 24219719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.