91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7486242)
1. Reliability of computer-generated prediction tracing.
Cangialosi TJ; Chung JM; Elliott DF; Meistrell ME
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 7486242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An evaluation of two VTO methods.
Sample LB; Sadowsky PL; Bradley E
Angle Orthod; 1998 Oct; 68(5):401-8. PubMed ID: 9770097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of manual traced images and corresponding scanned radiographs digitally traced.
Naoumova J; Lindman R
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 19342425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and testing of multilevel models for longitudinal craniofacial growth prediction.
Chvatal BA; Behrents RG; Ceen RF; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jul; 128(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 16027625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses.
Uysal T; Baysal A; Yagci A
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 19443692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgical prediction reliability: a comparison of two computer software systems.
Aharon PA; Eisig S; Cisneros GJ
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1997; 12(1):65-78. PubMed ID: 9456619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The accuracy of video imaging for mixed dentition and adolescent treatment.
Hoss K; Sameshima GT; Grubb JE; Sinclair PM
Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(5):355-64. PubMed ID: 9347109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A radiographic analysis of computer prediction in conjunction with orthognathic surgery.
Loh S; Heng JK; Ward-Booth P; Winchester L; McDonald F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Aug; 30(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 11518345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability of growth prediction with hand-wrist radiographs.
Verma D; Peltomäki T; Jäger A
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):438-42. PubMed ID: 19395369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dolphin Imaging Software: an analysis of the accuracy of cephalometric digitization and orthognathic prediction.
Power G; Breckon J; Sherriff M; McDonald F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Sep; 34(6):619-26. PubMed ID: 15916879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of video imaging in mandibular surgery.
Carter AC; Larson BE; Guenthner TA
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(4):289-300. PubMed ID: 9456606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Subjective evaluation of profile prediction using video imaging.
Giangreco TA; Forbes DP; Jacobson RS; Kallal RH; Moretti RJ; Marshall SD
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 9082009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences in cephalometric measurements: a comparison of digital versus hand-tracing methods.
Polat-Ozsoy O; Gokcelik A; Toygar Memikoglu TU
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 19349417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Digital image processing in orthodontics].
Tourné L
Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1996; 51(4):239-56. PubMed ID: 9289755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of soft and hard tissue profiles of orthognathic surgery patients treated recently and 20 years earlier.
Papadopoulos MA; Lazaridou-Terzoudi T; Øland J; Athanasiou AE; Melsen B
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jul; 108(1):e8-13. PubMed ID: 19540447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing digital serial cephalogram images for growth or treatment changes.
Ross LL; Munn MR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):161-2. PubMed ID: 16102397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of differential growth and orthodontic treatment outcome by regional cephalometric superpositions.
Efstratiadis SS; Cohen G; Ghafari J
Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 10371427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The accuracy of video imaging prediction in soft tissue outcome after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.
Lu CH; Ko EW; Huang CS
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Mar; 61(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 12618973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incisor stability in patients with anterior rotational mandibular growth.
Williams S; Andersen CE
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(6):431-42. PubMed ID: 8702069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis.
Celik E; Polat-Ozsoy O; Toygar Memikoglu TU
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 19237509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
