These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7486243)

  • 1. Changes in soft tissue profile of African-Americans following extraction treatment.
    Diels RM; Kalra V; DeLoach N; Powers M; Nelson SS
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(4):285-92. PubMed ID: 7486243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of premolar extractions on the soft-tissue profile in adult African American females.
    Caplan MJ; Shivapuja PK
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 9107377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Post-orthodontic cephalometric variations in bimaxillary protrusion cases managed by premolar extraction - A retrospective study.
    Alqahtani ND; Alshammari R; Almoammar K; Almosa N; Almahdy A; Albarakati SF
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Nov; 22(11):1530-1538. PubMed ID: 31719274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dental and soft tissue changes following extraction of second premolars in females with bimaxillary protrusion: A retrospective study.
    Alqahtani ND; Alqasir A; Al-Jewair T; Almoammar K; Albarakati SF
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Aug; 23(8):1110-1119. PubMed ID: 32788489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting soft tissue profile changes concurrent with orthodontic treatment.
    Yogosawa F
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 2389852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional soft-tissue and hard-tissue changes in the treatment of bimaxillary protrusion.
    Solem RC; Marasco R; Guiterrez-Pulido L; Nielsen I; Kim SH; Nelson G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):218-28. PubMed ID: 23910203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Profile changes following orthodontic treatment of bimaxillary protrusion in adults with the Begg appliance.
    Lew K
    Eur J Orthod; 1989 Nov; 11(4):375-81. PubMed ID: 2591485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determinants of successful treatment of bimaxillary protrusion: orthodontic treatment versus anterior segmental osteotomy.
    Baek SH; Kim BH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 16(2):234-46. PubMed ID: 15750420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Soft tissue changes following the extraction of premolars in nongrowing patients with bimaxillary protrusion. A systematic review.
    Leonardi R; Annunziata A; Licciardello V; Barbato E
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):211-6. PubMed ID: 19852663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lip curve changes in females with premolar extraction or nonextraction treatment.
    Moseling KP; Woods MG
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Feb; 74(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 15038491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Soft tissue facial profile changes after orthodontic treatment with four premolars extracted.
    Bravo LA
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 8172393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Soft tissue profile analysis in a sample of South African Blacks with bimaxillary protrusion.
    Beukes S; Dawjee SM; Hlongwa P
    SADJ; 2007 Jun; 62(5):206, 208-10, 212. PubMed ID: 17886588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion: traits and orthodontic correction.
    Bills DA; Handelman CS; BeGole EA
    Angle Orthod; 2005 May; 75(3):333-9. PubMed ID: 15898369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Soft tissue changes associated with first premolar extractions in adult females.
    Kachiwala VA; Kalha AS; Machado G
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 19634460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Facial soft-tissue shape changes after fixed edgewise treatment with premolar extraction in individual artificial-intelligence-classified facial profile patterns.
    Tanikawa C; Tan TJ; Takada K
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):740. PubMed ID: 38937790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term profile changes in extraction and nonextraction patients.
    Stephens CK; Boley JC; Behrents RG; Alexander RG; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Oct; 128(4):450-7. PubMed ID: 16214626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment effects of mini-implants for en-masse retraction of anterior teeth in bialveolar dental protrusion patients: a randomized controlled trial.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nagaraj K; Patil S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):18-29.e1. PubMed ID: 18617099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A study of Class III treatment: orthodontic camouflage vs orthognathic surgery.
    Georgalis K; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 Nov; 31(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 26999886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A longitudinal cephalometric study of the soft tissue profile of short- and long-face syndromes from 7 to 17 years.
    Blanchette ME; Nanda RS; Currier GF; Ghosh J; Nanda SK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Feb; 109(2):116-31. PubMed ID: 8638557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the changes in facial profile after orthodontic treatment, with and without extractions.
    Bravo LA; Canut JA; Pascual A; Bravo B
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Feb; 24(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 9088600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.