BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7486713)

  • 1. [Objective vocal evaluation of dysphonia by simultaneous measurement of acoustic and aerodynamic parameters with the EVA device].
    Giovanni A; Estublier N; Robert D; Teston B; Zanaret M; Cannoni M
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1995; 112(3):85-90. PubMed ID: 7486713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Objective voice analysis for dysphonic patients: a multiparametric protocol including acoustic and aerodynamic measurements.
    Yu P; Ouaknine M; Revis J; Giovanni A
    J Voice; 2001 Dec; 15(4):529-42. PubMed ID: 11792029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Objective voice analysis in dysphonic patients: new data including nonlinear measurements.
    Yu P; Garrel R; Nicollas R; Ouaknine M; Giovanni A
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2007; 59(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 17172783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic and aerodynamic measurement of speech production after supracricoid partial laryngectomy.
    Makeieff M; Barbotte E; Giovanni A; Guerrier B
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Mar; 115(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 15744175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of dysphonia due to benign vocal fold lesions by acoustic and aerodynamic indices: a multivariate analysis.
    Cantarella G; Baracca G; Pignataro L; Forti S
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Apr; 36(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 20950128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Preliminary study of acoustic and aerodynamic parameters after Tucker frontal anterior laryngectomy].
    Giovanni A; Robert D; Teston B; Guarella MD; Zanaret M
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1996; 113(5):277-84. PubMed ID: 9124768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Objective acoustic and aerodynamic measures of breathiness in paralytic dysphonia.
    Hartl DA; Hans S; Vaissière J; Brasnu DA
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2003 Apr; 260(4):175-82. PubMed ID: 12709799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Objective evaluation of dysphonia: preliminary results of a device allowing simultaneous acoustic and aerodynamic measurements.
    Giovanni A; Robert D; Estublier N; Teston B; Zanaret M; Cannoni M
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1996; 48(4):175-85. PubMed ID: 8823986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Clinical significance of calculating the coefficients of Lyapunov in the objective assessment of dysphonia].
    Yu P; Ouaknine M; Giovanni A
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2000; 121(5):301-5. PubMed ID: 11387653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Voice abnormalities and their relation with motor dysfunction in Parkinson's disease.
    Midi I; Dogan M; Koseoglu M; Can G; Sehitoglu MA; Gunal DI
    Acta Neurol Scand; 2008 Jan; 117(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 18031561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laryngostroboscopic evaluation after supracricoid partial laryngectomy.
    Makeieff M; Giovanni A; Guerrier B
    J Voice; 2007 Jul; 21(4):508-15. PubMed ID: 16626933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vocal improvement after voice therapy in unilateral vocal fold paralysis.
    Schindler A; Bottero A; Capaccio P; Ginocchio D; Adorni F; Ottaviani F
    J Voice; 2008 Jan; 22(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 17014987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of Parkinson's-related dysphonia.
    Sewall GK; Jiang J; Ford CN
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Oct; 116(10):1740-4. PubMed ID: 17003722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Voice therapy for vocal fold paralysis.
    Miller S
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2004 Feb; 37(1):105-19. PubMed ID: 15062689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response of the female vocal quality and resonance in professional voice users taking oral contraceptive pills: a multiparameter approach.
    Van Lierde KM; Claeys S; De Bodt M; Van Cauwenberge P
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Oct; 116(10):1894-8. PubMed ID: 17003704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements.
    Dejonckere PH; Remacle M; Fresnel-Elbaz E; Woisard V; Crevier-Buchman L; Millet B
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1996; 117(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 9102729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computerized acoustic voice analysis and subjective scaled evaluation of the voice can avoid the need for laryngoscopy after thyroid surgery.
    Ortega J; Cassinello N; Dorcaratto D; Leopaldi E
    Surgery; 2009 Mar; 145(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 19231578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison of different phonetic materials for perceptive analysis of dysphonia].
    Révis J; Giovanni A; Wuyts F; Triglia JM
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1997; 118(4):247-52. PubMed ID: 9637094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ceptral voice analysis: link with perception and stroboscopy.
    Dejonckere PH
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1998; 119(4):245-6. PubMed ID: 9865099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Objective voice quality analysis before and after onset of unilateral vocal fold paralysis.
    Hartl DM; Hans S; Vaissière J; Riquet M; Brasnu DF
    J Voice; 2001 Sep; 15(3):351-61. PubMed ID: 11575632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.