202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7487327)
1. [Influence of the valve position on the complications related to pericardial Carpentier-Edwards valve after 8 years].
Aupart M; Dreyfus X; Meurisse Y; May MA; Sirinelli A; Marchand M
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1995 Jul; 88(7):967-71. PubMed ID: 7487327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: eleven-year follow up of a prospective randomized trial.
Chaudhry MA; Raco L; Muriithi EW; Bernacca GM; Tolland MM; Wheatley DJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):429-37; discussion 437-8. PubMed ID: 10888102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 10-year results.
Murakami T; Eishi K; Nakano S; Kobayashi J; Sasako Y; Isobe F; Kosakai Y; Kito Y; Kawashima Y
J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8834725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Five-year evaluation of the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis.
Jamieson WR; Pelletier LC; Janusz MT; Chaitman BR; Tyers FO; Miyagishima RT
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Sep; 88(3):324-33. PubMed ID: 6381888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Eighteen-year follow up after Hancock II bioprosthesis insertion.
Legarra JJ; Llorens R; Catalan M; Segura I; Trenor AM; de Buruaga JS; Rabago G; Sarralde A
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 10096477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses: clinical performance assessed by actual analysis.
Jamieson WR; Miyagishima RT; Burr LH; Lichtenstein SV; Fradet GJ; Janusz MT
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Jul; 9(4):530-5. PubMed ID: 10947046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Twenty-year clinical experience with porcine bioprostheses.
Fann JI; Miller DC; Moore KA; Mitchell RS; Oyer PE; Stinson EB; Robbins RC; Reitz BA; Shumway NE
Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Nov; 62(5):1301-11; discussion 1311-2. PubMed ID: 8893561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Carpentier-Edwards bioprosthesis: a 7-year follow-up in 361 patients.
Zussa C; Del Ponte S; Ottino GM; Pansini S; Zattera G; Morea M
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Aug; 34(4):252-7. PubMed ID: 2429394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Late results with Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis.
Akins CW; Carroll DL; Buckley MJ; Daggett WM; Hilgenberg AD; Austen WG
Circulation; 1990 Nov; 82(5 Suppl):IV65-74. PubMed ID: 2225437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis. Comparison of early clinical performance in aortic and mitral positions.
Jamieson WR; Pelletier LC; Gerein AN; Pomar J
Can J Surg; 1992 Apr; 35(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 1562925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Actuarial versus actual freedom from structural valve deterioration with the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprostheses.
Jamieson WR; Burr LH; Miyagishima RT; Germann E; Anderson WN
Can J Cardiol; 1999 Sep; 15(9):973-8. PubMed ID: 10504178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical experience with the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis: short-term results (from 2 to 4.5 years).
Gallo I; Ruiz B; Duran CM
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Oct; 31(5):277-81. PubMed ID: 6196860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Double valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve: 10-year results.
Aupart MR; Babuty DG; Guesnier L; Meurisse YA; Sirinelli AL; Marchand MA
J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 May; 5(3):312-6. PubMed ID: 8793683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fifteen years follow up with the St. Jude Medical Biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
Mykén P; Bech-Hanssen O; Phipps B; Caidahl K
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):415-22. PubMed ID: 10888100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ten-years' clinical experience with the Sorin Pericarbon valve.
Folliguet TA; Dibie A; Czitrom D; Le Bret E; Laborde F
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 May; 9(3):423-8. PubMed ID: 10888101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Medtronic mosaic porcine bioprosthesis: investigational center experience to six years.
Jamieson WR; Fradet GJ; MacNab JS; Burr LH; Stanford EA; Janusz MT; Abel JG; Germann E; Cheung A
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jan; 14(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 15700437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Five-year follow up of the ATS mechanical heart valve.
Emery RW; Krogh CC; Jones DJ; Nicoloff DM; Blake DP; Arom KV
J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Mar; 13(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 15086262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Aortic valve replacement with pericardial bioprosthesis in patients under 60 years of age. Experience over 10 years].
Aupart M; Hammami S; Sirinelli A; Dreyfus X; Meurisse Y; Marchand M
Ann Chir; 1996; 50(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 8761106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Ultracor tilting disc heart valve prosthesis: a seven-year study.
Li HH; Jeffrey RR; Davidson KG; Seifert D; Körfer R; Grunkemeier GL
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Nov; 7(6):647-54. PubMed ID: 9870199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
