229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7488893)
1. UKCCCR multicentre randomised controlled trial of one and two view mammography in breast cancer screening.
Wald NJ; Murphy P; Major P; Parkes C; Townsend J; Frost C
BMJ; 1995 Nov; 311(7014):1189-93. PubMed ID: 7488893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammography screening: an incremental cost effectiveness analysis of two view versus one view procedures in London.
Bryan S; Brown J; Warren R
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1995 Feb; 49(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 7707010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammography screening: an incremental cost effectiveness analysis of double versus single reading of mammograms.
Brown J; Bryan S; Warren R
BMJ; 1996 Mar; 312(7034):809-12. PubMed ID: 8608287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two view mammography at incident screens: cost effectiveness analysis of policy options.
Johnston K; Brown J
BMJ; 1999 Oct; 319(7217):1097-102. PubMed ID: 10531098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The value of the second view in screening mammography.
Warren RM; Duffy SW; Bashir S
Br J Radiol; 1996 Feb; 69(818):105-8. PubMed ID: 8785635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: results from the UK National Health Service breast screening programme.
Blanks RG; Wallis MG; Moss SM
J Med Screen; 1998; 5(4):195-201. PubMed ID: 9934650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two-view versus single-view mammography at subsequent screening in a region of the Dutch breast screening programme.
van Breest Smallenburg V; Duijm LE; den Heeten GJ; Groenewoud JH; Jansen FH; Fracheboud J; Plaisier ML; van Doorne-Nagtegaal HJ; Broeders MJ
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2189-94. PubMed ID: 21906898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast MRI screening for average-risk women: A monte carlo simulation cost-benefit analysis.
Mango VL; Goel A; Mema E; Kwak E; Ha R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jun; 49(7):e216-e221. PubMed ID: 30632645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An investigation into why two-view mammography is better than one-view in breast cancer screening.
Hackshaw AK; Wald NJ; Michell MJ; Field S; Wilson AR
Clin Radiol; 2000 Jun; 55(6):454-8. PubMed ID: 10873691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of two view and one view mammography in the detection of small invasive cancers: results from the National Health Service breast screening programme.
Blanks RG; Moss SM; Wallis MG
J Med Screen; 1996; 3(4):200-3. PubMed ID: 9041485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mammography screening methods and diagnostic results.
Thurfjell E
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1995; 395():1-22. PubMed ID: 7839866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficiency of cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening: two versus one view mammography.
Blanks RG; Given-Wilson RM; Moss SM
J Med Screen; 1998; 5(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 9795875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Baseline screening mammography: one vs two views per breast.
Sickles EA; Weber WN; Galvin HB; Ominsky SH; Sollitto RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Dec; 147(6):1149-53. PubMed ID: 3490749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Baseline screening mammography with one versus two views.
Anttinen I; Pamilo M; Roiha M; Soiva M; Suramo I
Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):241-3. PubMed ID: 2591390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of interval breast cancer rates for two-versus single-view screening mammography: a population-based study.
Seigneurin A; Exbrayat C; Labarère J; Colonna M
Breast; 2009 Oct; 18(5):284-8. PubMed ID: 19713113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A trial to study the effect on breast cancer mortality of annual mammographic screening in women starting at age 40. Trial Steering Group.
Moss S
J Med Screen; 1999; 6(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 10572845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Observer variability in cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening in a study of two versus one view mammography.
Blanks RG; Wallis MG; Given-Wilson RM
J Med Screen; 1999; 6(3):152-8. PubMed ID: 10572847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Second-screening mammography: one versus two views per breast.
Ikeda DM; Sickles EA
Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):651-6. PubMed ID: 3406393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Modalities of reading of detection mammographies of the programme in the Bouches-du-Rhône. Results and costs 1990-1995].
Séradour B; Wait S; Jacquemier J; Dubuc M; Piana L
J Radiol; 1997 Jan; 78(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 9091620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
