125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7489279)
1. Absolute measures of image quality for the Sens-A-Ray direct digital intraoral radiography system.
Welander U; McDavid WD; Mörner AC; Tronje G; Tokuoka O; Fuchihata H; Nelvig P; Dove SB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Sep; 80(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 7489279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Basic technical properties of a system for direct acquisition of digital intraoral radiographs.
Welander U; Nelvig P; Tronje G; McDavid WD; Dove SB; Mörner AC; Cederlund T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Apr; 75(4):506-16. PubMed ID: 8464618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Resolution as defined by line spread and modulation transfer functions for four digital intraoral radiographic systems.
Welander U; McDavid WD; Sanderink GC; Tronje G; Mörner AC; Dove SB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jul; 78(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 8078652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Physical properties of a photostimulable phosphor system for intra-oral radiography.
Stamatakis HC; Welander U; McDavid WD
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 10654033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Physical performance measures of radiographic imaging systems.
Workman A; Brettle DS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 May; 26(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 9442599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sens-A-Ray characteristics with variations in beam quality.
Harada T; Nishikawa K; Shibuya H; Hayakawa Y; Kuroyanagi K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Jul; 80(1):120-3. PubMed ID: 7552852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of beam energy and filtration on the signal-to-noise ratio of the Dexis intraoral X-ray detector.
Kitagawa H; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 15140818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiation dosage reduction in general dental practice using digital intraoral radiographic systems.
Hayakawa Y; Shibuya H; Ota Y; Kuroyanagi K
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1997 Feb; 38(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9566150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of the detective quantum efficiency of a developmental detector for digital mammography.
Williams MB; Simoni PU; Smilowitz L; Stanton M; Phillips W; Stewart A
Med Phys; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2273-85. PubMed ID: 10587208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Image quality of direct digital intraoral x-ray sensors in assessing root canal length. The RadioVisioGraphy, Visualix/VIXA, Sens-A-Ray, and Flash Dent systems compared with Ektaspeed films.
Sanderink GC; Huiskens R; van der Stelt PF; Welander US; Stheeman SE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jul; 78(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 8078654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
Boyce SJ; Samei E
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensor noise in direct digital imaging (the RadioVisioGraphy, Sens-a-Ray, and Visualix/Vixa systems) evaluated by subtraction radiography.
Wenzel A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jan; 77(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 8108102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of observer performance in determining the position of endodontic files with physical measures in the evaluation of dental X-ray imaging systems.
Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Abdel-Nabi H; Farman TT; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jul; 29(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 10918454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Physical evaluation of a system for direct digital intra-oral radiography based on a charge-coupled device.
Yoshiura K; Stamatakis HC; Welander U; McDavid WD; Shi XQ; Ban S; Kawazu T; Tatsumi M; Kanda S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Sep; 28(5):277-83. PubMed ID: 10490745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitometric response of the Sens-A-Ray, a charge-coupled imaging device, to changes in beam energy.
Goshima T; Goshima Y; Scarfe WC; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Jan; 25(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 9084280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of additive noise on system performance of a digital X-ray imaging system.
Zhang D; Rong J; Chen WR; Gao F; Xu K; Wu X; Liu H
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 54(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 17260857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of x-ray spectra on the DQE of a computed radiography system.
Fetterly KA; Hangiandreou NJ
Med Phys; 2001 Feb; 28(2):241-9. PubMed ID: 11243349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Signal detectability in digital radiography: spatial domain figures of merit.
Gagne RM; Boswell JS; Myers KJ
Med Phys; 2003 Aug; 30(8):2180-93. PubMed ID: 12945984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sens-A-Ray. A new system for direct digital intraoral radiography.
Nelvig P; Wing K; Welander U
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Dec; 74(6):818-23. PubMed ID: 1488241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
