These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7489279)

  • 41. Accuracy validation of incident photon fluence on DQE for various measurement conditions and X-ray units.
    Haba T; Kondo S; Hayashi D; Koyama S
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2013 Jul; 6(2):423-30. PubMed ID: 23649923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Measurements of the modulation transfer function, normalized noise power spectrum and detective quantum efficiency for two flat panel detectors: a fluoroscopic and a cone beam computer tomography flat panel detectors.
    Benítez RB; Ning R; Conover D; Liu S
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2009; 17(4):279-93. PubMed ID: 19923685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Signal-to-noise ratio and spatial resolution in x-ray electronic imagers: is the MTF a relevant parameter?
    Moy JP
    Med Phys; 2000 Jan; 27(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 10659741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Physical imaging performance of a compact computed radiography acquisition device.
    Kengyelics SM; Launders JH; Cowen AR
    Med Phys; 1998 Mar; 25(3):354-60. PubMed ID: 9547503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Experimental and theoretical x-ray imaging performance comparison of iodine and lanthanide contrast agents.
    Cardinal HN; Holdsworth DW; Drangova M; Hobbs BB; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(1):15-31. PubMed ID: 8455493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A method to incorporate the effect of beam quality on image noise in a digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) based computer simulation for optimisation of digital radiography.
    Moore CS; Wood TJ; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(18):7379-7393. PubMed ID: 28742062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Improved image quality utilizing dual plate computed radiography.
    Workman A; Cowen AR
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Feb; 68(806):182-8. PubMed ID: 7735748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Development and application of programs to measure modulation transfer function, noise power spectrum and detective quantum efficiency.
    Padgett R; Kotre CJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):283-7. PubMed ID: 16461517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Performance evaluation of two computed radiography systems and patient dose in pelvic examination.
    Elshiekh E; Suliman II; Habbani F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):392-6. PubMed ID: 25836691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Image quality of a digital chest radiography system based on a selenium detector.
    Neitzel U; Maack I; Günther-Kohfahl S
    Med Phys; 1994 Apr; 21(4):509-16. PubMed ID: 8058016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A quality assurance framework for the fully automated and objective evaluation of image quality in cone-beam computed tomography.
    Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender WA
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031901. PubMed ID: 24593719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Cascaded systems analysis of noise reduction algorithms in dual-energy imaging.
    Richard S; Siewerdsen JH
    Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):586-601. PubMed ID: 18383680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Noise power spectra of images from digital mammography detectors.
    Williams MB; Mangiafico PA; Simoni PU
    Med Phys; 1999 Jul; 26(7):1279-93. PubMed ID: 10435530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Diagnostic yield of 90-kVp low-tube-voltage carotid and intracerebral CT-angiography: effects on radiation dose, image quality and diagnostic performance for the detection of carotid stenosis.
    Leithner D; Wichmann JL; Mahmoudi S; Martin SS; Albrecht MH; Vogl TJ; Scholtz JE
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Jun; 91(1086):20170927. PubMed ID: 29493282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of scintillator on the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of a digital imaging system.
    Farman TT; Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Miller SR; Lempicki A; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Feb; 101(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 16448925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Extension of x-ray imaging linear systems analysis to detectors with energy discrimination capability.
    Marchal JP
    Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2717-28. PubMed ID: 16193803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Method of measuring NEQ as a quality control metric for digital mammography.
    Bloomquist AK; Mainprize JG; Mawdsley GE; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031905. PubMed ID: 24593723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system.
    Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Dance DR
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 12674245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors.
    Samei E
    Med Phys; 2003 Jul; 30(7):1747-57. PubMed ID: 12906192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The application of image quality measurements for digital angiography.
    Peterzol A; Padovani R; Quai E; Vano E; Prieto C; Aviles P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):38-43. PubMed ID: 16461533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.