204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7489307)
1. False-positive results in dynamic MR mammography. Causes, frequency, and methods to avoid.
Kaiser WA
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):539-55. PubMed ID: 7489307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Gadolinium-DTPA (Magnevist) as contrast medium for galactography].
Kaltenborn H; Schadmand S; Beck T; Thelen M
Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):457-9. PubMed ID: 8527765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast disease: tissue characterization with Gd-DTPA enhancement profiles.
Stack JP; Redmond OM; Codd MB; Dervan PA; Ennis JT
Radiology; 1990 Feb; 174(2):491-4. PubMed ID: 2296657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast in patients with breast implants after cancer surgery.
Boné B; Aspelin P; Isberg B; Perbeck L; Veress B
Acta Radiol; 1995 Mar; 36(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 7710787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of mammographic breast lesions with Tc-99m sestamibi scintimammography and contrast enhanced MRI.
Sommer H; Tiling R; Pechmann M; Kindermann G; Kress K; Moser R; Tatsch K; Hahn K; Pfluger T; Assemi C
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1997; 119(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 9050197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The variability of fibroadenoma in contrast-enhanced dynamic MR mammography.
Brinck U; Fischer U; Korabiowska M; Jutrowski M; Schauer A; Grabbe E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1331-4. PubMed ID: 9129437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Morphology and contrast enhancement of ductal carcinoma in situ in dynamic 1.0 T MR mammography].
Sittek H; Kessler M; Heuck AF; Bredl T; Perlet C; Künzer I; Lebeau A; Untch M; Reiser M
Rofo; 1997 Sep; 167(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 9376552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Ductal carcinoma in situ in dynamic MR-mammography at 1.5 T].
Fischer U; Westerhof JP; Brinck U; Korabiowska M; Schauer A; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1996 Apr; 164(4):290-4. PubMed ID: 8645861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Contrast medium assisted dynamic MR-mammography after diagnostic and therapeutic interventions on the breast].
Fischer U; Vosshenrich R; Kopka L; Kahlen O; Grabbe E
Bildgebung; 1996 Jun; 63(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 8756151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast lesions: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging and with T2*-weighted first-pass perfusion MR imaging.
Kvistad KA; Rydland J; Vainio J; Smethurst HB; Lundgren S; Fjøsne HE; Haraldseth O
Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):545-53. PubMed ID: 10924584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Dynamic contrast medium studies with flash sequences in nuclear magnetic resonance tomography of the breast].
Heywang SH; Hilbertz T; Pruss E; Wolf A; Permanetter W; Eiermann W; Lissner J
Digitale Bilddiagn; 1988 Mar; 8(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 3383539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features.
Stomper PC; Herman S; Klippenstein DL; Winston JS; Edge SB; Arredondo MA; Mazurchuk RV; Blumenson LE
Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):387-95. PubMed ID: 7480682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The specificity of contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging.
Piccoli CW
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):557-71. PubMed ID: 7489308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: comparison of two different doses of gadopentetate dimeglumine.
Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Haustein J; Pohl C; Beck R; Lommatzsch B; Untch M; Nathrath WB
Radiology; 1994 Jun; 191(3):639-46. PubMed ID: 8184040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Magnetic resonance mammography--open questions].
Kessler M; Sittek H; Reiser M
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1996 Aug; 56(8):M107-15. PubMed ID: 8974887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Quantitative dynamic contrast breast-MRI with the 0.5 tesla equipment].
Klengel S; Hietschold V; Schreiber M; Köhler K
Rontgenpraxis; 1994 Aug; 47(8):223-8. PubMed ID: 7974011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. MR imaging of the breast. Imaging and tissue characterization without intravenous contrast.
Santyr GE
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):673-90. PubMed ID: 7489316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MR imaging of the breast after surgery for breast cancer.
Whitehouse GH; Moore NR
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):591-603. PubMed ID: 7489311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Malignant-lesion segmentation using 4D co-occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast image data.
Woods BJ; Clymer BD; Kurc T; Heverhagen JT; Stevens R; Orsdemir A; Bulan O; Knopp MV
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):495-501. PubMed ID: 17279534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [MR imaging for breast cancer].
Seki T; Hachiya J; Nitatori T; Yokoyama K; Fukushima H; Uchigasaki S
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 May; 97(5):347-56. PubMed ID: 8709936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
