BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7489318)

  • 1. Breast MR imaging. An analysis of its role with respect to other imaging and interventional modalities.
    Brenner RJ
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):705-23. PubMed ID: 7489318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital mammography: clinical image evaluation.
    Bassett LW; Hoyt AC; Oshiro T
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):903-15. PubMed ID: 20868893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Critical pathways for the future: MR imaging and digital mammography.
    Newstead GM; Weinreb JC
    Radiographics; 1995 Jul; 15(4):951-62. PubMed ID: 7569140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MR imaging of the breast.
    Weinreb JC; Newstead G
    Radiology; 1995 Sep; 196(3):593-610. PubMed ID: 7644617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM).
    Daniaux M; De Zordo T; Santner W; Amort B; Koppelstätter F; Jaschke W; Dromain C; Oberaigner W; Hubalek M; Marth C
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Oct; 292(4):739-47. PubMed ID: 25814297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dense breasts: a review of reporting legislation and available supplemental screening options.
    Ho JM; Jafferjee N; Covarrubias GM; Ghesani M; Handler B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Aug; 203(2):449-56. PubMed ID: 25055284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer screening.
    Lee CH; Weinreb JC
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Mar; 1(3):176-82. PubMed ID: 17411555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Beyond the mammogram.
    Cowley G
    Newsweek; 1997 Feb; 129(8):59. PubMed ID: 10164991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Analysis of Cost-effectiveness of screening for breast cancer with conventional mammography, digital and magnetic resonance imaging].
    Peregrino AA; Vianna CM; de Almeida CE; Gonzáles GB; Machado SC; Costa e Silva FV; Rodrigues MP
    Cien Saude Colet; 2012 Jan; 17(1):215-22. PubMed ID: 22218554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast MR imaging: current indications and advanced imaging techniques.
    Weinstein S; Rosen M
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):1013-42. PubMed ID: 20868898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Contrast-Enhanced Breast MR Imaging.
    Lewin J
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2018 May; 26(2):259-263. PubMed ID: 29622130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tests for breast cancer. Mammography is going digital. But is it better than film?
    Harv Health Lett; 2007 May; 32(7):4-5. PubMed ID: 17575613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Magnetic tomography of the breast].
    Skaane P
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1998 Jun; 118(16):2486-90. PubMed ID: 9667126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer.
    Lee CH; Dershaw DD; Kopans D; Evans P; Monsees B; Monticciolo D; Brenner RJ; Bassett L; Berg W; Feig S; Hendrick E; Mendelson E; D'Orsi C; Sickles E; Burhenne LW
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2010 Jan; 7(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 20129267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
    Jochelson M
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2014 May; 52(3):609-16. PubMed ID: 24792660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advances in breast imaging. Although mammography remains standard for breast cancer screening, several newer technologies are helping to fine-tune diagnosis.
    Harv Womens Health Watch; 2010 May; 17(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 20593556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dedicated breast computed tomography: the optimal cross-sectional imaging solution?
    Lindfors KK; Boone JM; Newell MS; D'Orsi CJ
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):1043-54. PubMed ID: 20868899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contrast enhanced spectral mammography: better than MRI?
    Thibault F; Balleyguier C; Tardivon A; Dromain C
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S162-4. PubMed ID: 23083575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MR imaging of the breast. Imaging and tissue characterization without intravenous contrast.
    Santyr GE
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):673-90. PubMed ID: 7489316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of mammography, MRI, and ultrasonography for breast cancer screening.
    Feig S
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):879-91. PubMed ID: 20868891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.