179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7489318)
21. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Padula S; Altomari F; Moriconi E; Pronio AM; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):670-80. PubMed ID: 17446524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Cost-effectiveness analysis of preoperative MR mammography in suspect breast lesions].
Schneider A; Malur S; Hartmann M
Rofo; 2002 Apr; 174(4):501; author reply 501-2. PubMed ID: 11960419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Technical developments in mammography.
Yaffe MJ; Mainprize JG; Jong RA
Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):599-611. PubMed ID: 18849694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging.
Plevritis SK; Kurian AW; Sigal BM; Daniel BL; Ikeda DM; Stockdale FE; Garber AM
JAMA; 2006 May; 295(20):2374-84. PubMed ID: 16720823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Image quality and radiation exposure in mass mammography examinations: a report from the Survey Group for Institutional Evaluation].
Suzuki R; Horita K; Asahara M; Koyama S; Sanada S; Terada H; Nishitani M; Ishikawa M; Wakamaru A; Kurowarabi K; Negishi T;
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 May; 59(5):604-16. PubMed ID: 12881688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA enhancement: comparison with mammography and ultrasonography.
Hachiya J; Seki T; Okada M; Nitatori T; Korenaga T; Furuya Y
Radiat Med; 1991; 9(6):232-40. PubMed ID: 1668410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Current status of the diagnosis of breast cancer.
de Paredes ES
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 1985; 14(2):1-54. PubMed ID: 3891237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer in premenopausal women.
Wright H; Listinsky J; Rim A; Chellman-Jeffers M; Patrick R; Rybicki L; Kim J; Crowe J
Am J Surg; 2005 Oct; 190(4):572-5. PubMed ID: 16164923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Breast imaging.
Kopans DB; Meyer JE; Sadowsky N
N Engl J Med; 1984 Apr; 310(15):960-7. PubMed ID: 6366562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional MR imaging of the breast.
Harms SE; Flamig DP; Hesley KL; Evans WP; Cheek JH; Peters GN; Knox SM; Savino DA; Netto GJ; Wells RB
Radiographics; 1993 Mar; 13(2):247-67. PubMed ID: 8460218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Nonmammographic breast imaging techniques. Current status and future developments.
Kopans DB
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 14(3):651-65. PubMed ID: 3323969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The use of breast imaging to screen women at high risk for cancer.
Sickles EA
Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):859-78. PubMed ID: 20868890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Comprehensive magnetic resonance imaging for breast cancer].
Meladze NV; Ternovoĭ SK; Sharia MA; Solopova AE
Ter Arkh; 2013; 85(4):29-33. PubMed ID: 23808288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cost effectiveness of breast cancer screening with contrast-enhanced MRI in high-risk women.
Taneja C; Edelsberg J; Weycker D; Guo A; Oster G; Weinreb J
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Mar; 6(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 19248993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Breast imaging: raising the bar.
Wadden N
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2005 Dec; 56(5):270. PubMed ID: 16579019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.
US Preventive Services Task Force
Ann Intern Med; 2009 Nov; 151(10):716-26, W-236. PubMed ID: 19920272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cost-effectiveness of screening women with familial risk for breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging.
Saadatmand S; Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Rutgers EJ; Hoogerbrugge N; Oosterwijk JC; Tollenaar RA; Hooning M; Loo CE; Obdeijn IM; Heijnsdijk EA; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Sep; 105(17):1314-21. PubMed ID: 23940285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. New methods for imaging the breast: techniques, findings, and potential.
Adler DD; Wahl RL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jan; 164(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 7998538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. MR Imaging as an Additional Screening Modality for the Detection of Breast Cancer in Women Aged 50-75 Years with Extremely Dense Breasts: The DENSE Trial Study Design.
Emaus MJ; Bakker MF; Peeters PH; Loo CE; Mann RM; de Jong MD; Bisschops RH; Veltman J; Duvivier KM; Lobbes MB; Pijnappel RM; Karssemeijer N; de Koning HJ; van den Bosch MA; Monninkhof EM; Mali WP; Veldhuis WB; van Gils CH
Radiology; 2015 Nov; 277(2):527-37. PubMed ID: 26110667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast.
Cleveland DL; Broussard M
Radiol Technol; 1995; 67(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 8570848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
