179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7489318)
41. [Value of MR-guided localization and biopsy in breast lesions].
Obenauer S; Grabbe E; Knollmann F
Rofo; 2006 May; 178(5):477-83. PubMed ID: 16708322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Current status of breast MR imaging. Part 2. Clinical applications.
Kuhl CK
Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):672-91. PubMed ID: 17709824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
Hauth EA; Stockamp C; Maderwald S; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Jaeger H; Barkhausen J; Forsting M
Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [The technique and results of mammography].
Friedrich M
Radiologe; 1993 May; 33(5):243-59. PubMed ID: 8516435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: Does mammography provide additional clinical benefits or can some radiation exposure be avoided?
Fallenberg EM; Dromain C; Diekmann F; Renz DM; Amer H; Ingold-Heppner B; Neumann AU; Winzer KJ; Bick U; Hamm B; Engelken F
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Jul; 146(2):371-81. PubMed ID: 24986697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Breast imaging today and tomorrow.
Cole CF; Coleman C
Nurse Pract Forum; 1999 Sep; 10(3):129-36. PubMed ID: 10614357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Feature extraction and classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted breast image data.
Torheim G; Godtliebsen F; Axelson D; Kvistad KA; Haraldseth O; Rinck PA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1293-301. PubMed ID: 11811829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer.
Orel SG; Schnall MD
Radiology; 2001 Jul; 220(1):13-30. PubMed ID: 11425968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Summaries for patients. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations.
Ann Intern Med; 2009 Nov; 151(10):I44. PubMed ID: 19920254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Imaging the augmented breast.
Kaufman BM; Lamarche J; Schultze-Haakh H
Radiol Technol; 2007; 78(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 17242438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Anxiety and specific distress in women at intermediate and high risk of breast cancer before and after surveillance by magnetic resonance imaging and mammography versus standard mammography.
Brédart A; Kop JL; Fall M; Pelissier S; Simondi C; Dolbeault S; Livartowski A; Tardivon A;
Psychooncology; 2012 Nov; 21(11):1185-94. PubMed ID: 21812069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Mammography with minimal radiation dosage. Comparative studies on various imaging systems].
Weissleder H; Kiefer H
Rofo; 1977 Jun; 126(6):520-8. PubMed ID: 142713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Breast MR imaging screening in women with a history of breast conservation therapy.
Gweon HM; Cho N; Han W; Yi A; Moon HG; Noh DY; Moon WK
Radiology; 2014 Aug; 272(2):366-73. PubMed ID: 24635678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Economic aspects of MR-mammography in dense breasts.
Kaiser CG; Reich C; Wasser K; Schönberg SO; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S69-71. PubMed ID: 23083609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Do we need randomized controlled clinical trials to evaluate the clinical impact of breast MR imaging?
Hillman BJ
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2006 Aug; 14(3):403-9, vii-viii. PubMed ID: 17098181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. When and when not to biopsy the breast.
Newstead G
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1993 Mar; 15(3):111, 115-6. PubMed ID: 10148387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. [Current status of screening digital mammography in Japan].
Yamada T; Suzuki A
Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():318-23. PubMed ID: 17679206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparison of costs and benefits of breast cancer screening with mammography, ultrasonography, and MRI.
Feig S
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2011 Mar; 38(1):179-96, ix. PubMed ID: 21419333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: costs and efficiency].
Golder WA
Onkologie; 2001 Apr; 24(2):185-8. PubMed ID: 11441302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. [The significance of MDR (mammo digital-radiography) in breast cancer mass screening].
Kido C
Gan No Rinsho; 1989 May; Spec No():220-6. PubMed ID: 2689663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
