These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7489588)
1. In vivo validation of an experimental adaptive quantitative coronary angiography algorithm to circumvent overestimation of small luminal diameters. Keane D; Gronenschild E; Slager C; Ozaki Y; Haase J; Serruys PW Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1995 Sep; 36(1):17-24; discussion 25-6. PubMed ID: 7489588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative validation of quantitative coronary angiography systems. Results and implications from a multicenter study using a standardized approach. Keane D; Haase J; Slager CJ; Montauban van Swijndregt E; Lehmann KG; Ozaki Y; di Mario C; Kirkeeide R; Serruys PW Circulation; 1995 Apr; 91(8):2174-83. PubMed ID: 7697846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sources of error in quantitative coronary angiography. Herrington DM; Siebes M; Walford GD Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1993 Aug; 29(4):314-21. PubMed ID: 8221856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo comparison of different quantitative edge detection systems used for measuring coronary arterial diameters. Desmet W; De Scheerder I; Beatt K; Huehns T; Piessens J Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1995 Jan; 34(1):72-80; discussion 81. PubMed ID: 7728860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adaptive approach to accurate analysis of small-diameter vessels in cineangiograms. Sonka M; Reddy GK; Winniford MD; Collins SM IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Feb; 16(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 9050411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Coronary vessel and luminal area measurement using dual-source computed tomography in comparison with intravascular ultrasound: effect of window settings on measurement accuracy. Marwan M; Pflederer T; Schepis T; Seltmann M; Ropers D; Daniel WG; Achenbach S J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 21245696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of quantitative coronary angiography systems using a unique set of in vivo coronary stenosis images. Mancini GB; Yeoh E; Kamimura C; Abbott D Can J Cardiol; 2001 Jul; 17(7):785-91. PubMed ID: 11468645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In-vivo validation of on-line and off-line geometric coronary measurements using insertion of stenosis phantoms in porcine coronary arteries. Haase J; Di Mario C; Slager CJ; van der Giessen WJ; den Boer A; de Feyter PJ; Reiber JH; Verdouw PD; Serruys PW Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1992 Sep; 27(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 1525805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On-line quantitative coronary analysis in clinical practice: one step closer to reality? Ribichini F; Steffenino G; Dellavalle A; Mina P; Cerati R; Dalmasso M; Uslenghi E Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1994 Feb; 31(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 8149420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dual quantitative coronary angiography: a novel approach to quantify intracoronary thrombotic burden. Aleong G; Vaqueriza D; Del Valle R; Garcia H; Hernandez R; Alfonso F; Jimenez-Quevedo P; Bañuelos C; Macaya C; Escaned J EuroIntervention; 2009 Jan; 4(4):475-80. PubMed ID: 19284069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of quantitative coronary angiography in a cineless environment: in vivo assessment of a fully automated system for clinical use. Cusma JT; Spero LA; van der Geest RJ; Bashore TM; Morris KG Am Heart J; 1995 Feb; 129(2):300-6. PubMed ID: 7832103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can the same edge-detection algorithm be applied to on-line and off-line analysis systems? Validation of a new cinefilm-based geometric coronary measurement software. Haase J; van der Linden MM; Di Mario C; van der Giessen WJ; Foley DP; Serruys PW Am Heart J; 1993 Aug; 126(2):312-21. PubMed ID: 8338000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The need for dedicated bifurcation quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) software algorithms to evaluate bifurcation lesions. Grundeken MJ; Ishibashi Y; Ramcharitar S; Tuinenburg JC; Reiber JH; Tu S; Aben JP; Girasis C; Wykrzykowska JJ; Onuma Y; Serruys PW EuroIntervention; 2015; 11 Suppl V():V44-9. PubMed ID: 25983170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of 4 French catheters for quantitative coronary analysis: in vivo variability assessment using 6 French guiding catheters as reference scaling devices. Sanmartin M; Goicolea J; Castellanos R; Bravo M; Ocaranza R; Cuevas D; Mantilla R; Ruiz-Salmeron R J Invasive Cardiol; 2004 Mar; 16(3):113-6. PubMed ID: 15152158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Advantages and limitations of two software calipers in quantitative coronary arteriography. Koning G; Reiber JH; von Land CD; Loois G; van Meurs B Int J Card Imaging; 1991; 7(1):15-30. PubMed ID: 1753156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pitfalls in the determination of absolute dimensions using angiographic catheters as calibration devices in quantitative angiography. Fortin DF; Spero LA; Cusma JT; Santoro L; Burgess R; Bashore TM Am J Cardiol; 1991 Nov; 68(11):1176-82. PubMed ID: 1951077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]