These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7489604)

  • 1. Electrocardiographic interpretation (1995): can we do better?--Part II.
    Hurst JW
    Clin Cardiol; 1995 Sep; 18(9):493-5. PubMed ID: 7489604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of finite element and integral equation formulations for the calculation of electrocardiographic potentials--II.
    Pilkington TC; Morrow MN; Stanley PC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1987 Mar; 34(3):258-60. PubMed ID: 3570317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modern morphologic electrocardiographic interpretation--a valuable tool for rapid clinical decision making in acute ischemic coronary syndromes.
    Nikus KC; Eskola MJ; Niemelä KO; Sclarovsky S
    J Electrocardiol; 2005 Jan; 38(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 15660340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Pitfalls in the interpretation of electrocardiographic signals].
    Vítovec J; Zeman K
    Vnitr Lek; 2003 Sep; 49(9):713-7. PubMed ID: 14584420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new user-oriented electrocardiographic program.
    Caceres CA
    G Ital Cardiol; 1975; 5(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 1102375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Value of the electrocardiographic examination.
    Brohet C
    Acta Cardiol; 1999 Aug; 54(4):181-5. PubMed ID: 10511892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic pitfalls in a scanned electrocardiogram.
    MacKenzie R
    J Insur Med; 2008; 40(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 19119595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrocardiographic interpretation (1995): can we do better?--Part I.
    Hurst JW
    Clin Cardiol; 1995 Aug; 18(8):433-9. PubMed ID: 7586760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Proceedings: Diagnostic criteria for evaluating atrial loading in electrocardiography--5. Examination of electrocardiographic criteria by linear discriminant function].
    Maeda J; Oshiro T; Fujita I; Takasugi T; Tsukano K
    Jpn Circ J; 1975 Jul; 39(7):838-9. PubMed ID: 1159948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peculiar Electrocardiographic Aspects of Wide QRS Complex Tachycardia: When Differential Diagnosis Is Difficult.
    De Ponti R; Marazzato J; Bagliani G; Tondini A; Donzelli S; Padeletti L
    Card Electrophysiol Clin; 2018 Jun; 10(2):317-332. PubMed ID: 29784486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of an electrocardiographic analysis system: implications for pharmacodynamic studies.
    Hoon TJ
    Pharmacotherapy; 1996; 16(2):230-6. PubMed ID: 8820466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Sudden cardiac death prevention in athletes. Electrocardiogram interpretation: the Seattle criteria].
    Mélon P
    Rev Med Liege; 2014 Dec; 69(12):668-70. PubMed ID: 25796784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Hardware-software system for noninvasive electrocardiographic examination of heart based on inverse problem of electrocardiography].
    Bokeriia LA; Revishvili ASh; Kalinin AV; Kalinin VV; Liadzhina OA; Fetisova EA
    Med Tekh; 2008; (6):1-7. PubMed ID: 19172879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Recommendations for the interpretation and evaluation of childrens electrocardiograms. Short programmed course, 5. report: partial program II (1. part): morphology].
    Mücke D; Bartel J
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1976 Jun; 70(12):654-9. PubMed ID: 997605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of abnormal electrocardiogram observed during surgery: Part 1. Lead placement methods and artifacts.
    Osawa A
    Anesth Pain Control Dent; 1992; 1(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 1298492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variability of electrocardiographic precordial lead placement: a method to improve accuracy and reliability.
    Herman MV; Ingram DA; Levy JA; Cook JR; Athans RJ
    Clin Cardiol; 1991 Jun; 14(6):469-76. PubMed ID: 1810683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrocardiographic body surface potential mapping.
    Lux RL
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1982; 8(3):253-79. PubMed ID: 6754256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [News in electrocardiographic diagnosis].
    Cagán S
    Vnitr Lek; 1985 Apr; 31(4):360-5. PubMed ID: 4002629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Types of electrocardiographic tests].
    Maeda K
    Kango Gijutsu; 1980 Jan; 26(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 6898241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Electrocardiographic study method].
    Pashkov VV
    Feldsher Akush; 1981; 46(11):29-35. PubMed ID: 6914950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.