110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7489628)
1. Classifying interval cancers.
Duncan AA; Wallis MG
Clin Radiol; 1995 Nov; 50(11):774-7. PubMed ID: 7489628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reviewing interval cancers: time well spent?
Gower-Thomas K; Fielder HM; Branston L; Greening S; Beer H; Rogers C
Clin Radiol; 2002 May; 57(5):384-8. PubMed ID: 12014936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two models for radiological reviewing of interval cancers.
Moberg K; Grundström H; Törnberg S; Lundquist H; Svane G; Havervall L; Muren C
J Med Screen; 1999; 6(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 10321369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interval cancer peer review in East Anglia: implications for monitoring doctors as well as the NHS breast screening programme.
Britton PD; McCann J; O'Driscoll D; Hunnam G; Warren RM
Clin Radiol; 2001 Jan; 56(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11162697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience.
Destounis SV; DiNitto P; Logan-Young W; Bonaccio E; Zuley ML; Willison KM
Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):578-84. PubMed ID: 15229350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Breast carcinoma diagnosed in mammographic screening incidentally. Research on the radiologic signs in prior mammograms].
Marra V; Frigerio A; Di Virgilio MR; Menna S; Burke P
Radiol Med; 1999 Nov; 98(5):342-6. PubMed ID: 10780212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A true screening environment for review of interval breast cancers: pilot study to reduce bias.
Gordon PB; Borugian MJ; Warren Burhenne LJ
Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):411-5. PubMed ID: 17848684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Second round cancers: how many were visible on the first round of the UK National Breast Screening Programme, three years earlier?
Daly CA; Apthorp L; Field S
Clin Radiol; 1998 Jan; 53(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 9464431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammography screening using independent double reading with consensus: is there a potential benefit for computer-aided detection?
Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Hofvind S; Jahr G; Castellino RA
Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 22287148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interval breast cancers in screening: the effect of mammography review method on classification.
Ciatto S; Catarzi S; Lamberini MP; Risso G; Saguatti G; Abbattista T; Martinelli F; Houssami N
Breast; 2007 Dec; 16(6):646-52. PubMed ID: 17624779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A review of interval breast cancers diagnosed among participants of the Nova Scotia Breast Screening Program.
Payne JI; Caines JS; Gallant J; Foley TJ
Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 23169791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of previous films on screening mammographic interpretation and detection of breast carcinoma.
Callaway MP; Boggis CR; Astley SA; Hutt I
Clin Radiol; 1997 Jul; 52(7):527-9. PubMed ID: 9240705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reassessment of breast cancers missed during routine screening mammography: a community-based study.
Yankaskas BC; Schell MJ; Bird RE; Desrochers DA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Sep; 177(3):535-41. PubMed ID: 11517043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A pilot evaluation of the R2 image checker system and users' response in the detection of interval breast cancers on previous screening films.
Garvican L; Field S
Clin Radiol; 2001 Oct; 56(10):833-7. PubMed ID: 11895300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiological review of incidence breast cancers.
Moberg K; Grundström H; Lundquist H; Svane G; Havervall E; Muren C
J Med Screen; 2000; 7(4):177-83. PubMed ID: 11202583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interval breast cancers: absolute and proportional incidence and blinded review in a community mammographic screening program.
Carbonaro LA; Azzarone A; Paskeh BB; Brambilla G; Brunelli S; Calori A; Caumo F; Malerba P; Menicagli L; Sconfienza LM; Vadalà G; Brambilla G; Fantini L; Ciatto S; Sardanelli F
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):e84-91. PubMed ID: 24369953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: results from the UK National Health Service breast screening programme.
Blanks RG; Wallis MG; Moss SM
J Med Screen; 1998; 5(4):195-201. PubMed ID: 9934650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
